Mistakes can happen and when they do, they are corrected. That article was fixed swiftly but sadly the video can’t be taken down. It was created by the video team and has no connection to model making decions taken by developers.
Unfortunately making claims of a historical error without a report to support it is not something we can do anything about as you would be well aware.
Will we get more dev today？
Smin, with all due respect I haven’t the time nor energy to keep making reports. I’ve had friends make reports with more information than most novels only to have them blown off.
look at the numbers, compared to last 4 cycles it would be this week with regard to days since first vehicle devblog.
Some dude just said the Chinese community claims it’s not coming this week.
So we’ll see
It’s a twin 4 inch aa mount from 1924
True. Though plenty of very well researched and evidenced reports that have been acknowledged well over a year ago. Granted something’s take time to fix or whatever, but others… I don’t understand why they have taken so long to address
There’s hundreds of bug reports rotting there for months if not years.
agm-65d or other ir guided weapon on it could be too op, considering the gap, I guess it will only be given agm-65b and gbu-8? make it a good.11.7 cas.
this could be possible, new things are always welcomed, and it won’t break balance
@Smin1080p_WT I do agree with this. It seems that very simple things can sit in report purgatory for years without a change.
Sadly then without one there is nothing I further I can do for you here.
Reports are not rejected without a reason unless they failed to meet the criteria.
No. No and no.
1924 installed 4 mk V, not XVI
XVI is 1938
And devblog is changed.
hmmmmmmmmmm
Correction, they said yesterday that no teaser comes that day. Nothing about this week.
I mean we’ve had it with staff biases before. Look, it’s such a simply fix - it’s changing 2 numbers. If you look at the model yourself please tell me you see the 4 inch aa guns, which didn’t even get mounted until 1924
There are a various amount of reasons for that unfortunately. Often things can be in queue for a model correction, awaiting an allocated spot for when a model can be revisited, when a weapon system or type is due to be reviewed or when the information within the report can be fully confirmed if it has conflicts with existing material (often meaning we have to find addional confirmation somehow from further sources) just to name but a few.
@Smin1080p_WT How many people do you think the Aussi F-111 would annoy since it’s been leaked it could go to Britain.
: P
but those are 4 inch guns as you can see. Now the blog doesn’t even mention the guns that are clearly visable
You haven’t provided any evidence to support your claims.
I’m sorry, but if you believe something is incorrect, please take the matter to a bug report and submit it properly. Then it can be reviewed and corrected.
Getting argumentative here isn’t going to solve anything.
May the hopium continue its flow
I don’t report bugs anymore because i’ve helped in reporting vehicles with the manufacturer’s bill of sale only to be told it isn’t a valid document. I’m done helping people who lack eyes and cannot read