this time I’ll trust Gszabi
They are purely Australian, and thus belong in the British tree. Stop acting like Australia is a sub nation of Britain.
where did I say Australia was a sub nation of Britain?
I never said you did. I said you acted like it is.
Weren’t they made in the US though?
No.
well how did I act this way?
is a Counter example (is this the right translation?) enough to make you think im the enemy that wants to grasp Australia ?
I know its not practical… but i have hope lol
You said that the AC 1 and Boomerang, Australian vehicles, being in the British tree means that the F-111C, an American vehicle that was used by Australia, will be in it also.
1 Like
Manufacturer is listed as General Dynamics
1 Like
I wasn’t talking about the F-111C.
Oh, things are getting hard to follow
Fair enough.
that’s your interpretation
my Intention was to show that there are Australian vehicles in other trees too
in the case of Britain even in the tech tree
I see now, yes if something is domestically built by Australia or Canada it should go to Britain, if it’s a foreign piece of equipment it should go to the country of origin (US or Germany)
Thats what Gaijin has been doing so far.
1 Like
so apparently the US aided in design and offered to produce some but didn’t because they were busy making 20,000 Wildcats
uses a license build P&W engine tho
That puts about as many TT as premium Aussie vehicles I guess so an F-111C really can go either way.
wait what? which sunderland is the Australian version?
Not the place for this argument again but for reference the Australian f111 and G were only ever used by Royal Australian Air Force and were custom order. Being heavily modified even after delivery to Australia.
Not for this thread though.
Smin did say numerous times that Australia isn’t tied to 1 tree. So the 111C in the british tree wouldn’t really suprise me anyway.