If a Aussi F-111 is coming I damn hope it’s for Britain.
1 Like
Not likely
Consider the track record up to this point:
M1A1 AIM - USA
Leopard C2A1 - Germany
Leopard 2A4M CAN - Germany
Gaijin tends to favor the manufacturer’s nation.
I guess the exception is ADATS M113, which was placed in GB TT because it was needed there. It was also largely a Canadian domestic development, as far as I know.
1 Like
Indian T-90 and MiG-21Bison?
2 Likes
Sub tree
Well, as we’ve been told, Canadian and Australian vehicles go where they are most needed and/or appropriate.
So, since Britain doesn’t need a F-111, an Aussie Aardvark would got to the US, if it was added
Blame Gaijin for turning India into a subtree for Britain
Good point. It seems Gaijin decided to deviate from their regular practices.
Why they did this for India and not any of the other commonwealth nations, I do not know
What about F111K?
3 Likes
That has been soft-denied in the past, hasn’t it?
But do Americans need another F-111? IIRC Brits don’t have heavy duty bomber as of now
Hard denied
2 Likes
You do realise Smin also said that Australia and canada can be in nations that can be in need of them ?
1 Like
The US didn’t need the AIM and the Germans didn’t need the Canadian Leopards either.
Britain does have heavy duty bombers, the Tornado and the Buccaneers.
In that case, why didn’t GB receive the Leopard 2A4M CAN or M1A1 AIM? I think the GB TT could really benefit from either of them
1 Like
The only placement rules for Canada and Australia is that there is no rules.
As of right now it equally if not more likely for the Avro Arrow to end up in the USSR tree then any others. Or for them to put their stuff in the Chinese trees.
Man, this thing again
6 Likes
Because we don’t need them
