Oh this is my list Germans want x nation as subs because the Germans say we wanting the world because of Australia and Canada lol
2 Likes
No it’s not since it’s only kills are party ballons
it’s all Bismarck’s fault… If only Wilhelm II had been born a generation earlier… Jokes aside, 150 years later, the legacy endures lol
It’s very curious that the Aussie Abrams is in the US tech tree and the Aussie Aardvark is in the British tech tree… It seems that the only rule is that there are no rules; everything is very arbitrary.
3 Likes
Spain/ Portugal would have been objectively a better sub tree than Hungary in every way possible. They only did Hungary because they’re based in Hungary.
2 Likes
More like easier copy&paste. Spain would require some actual work.
3 Likes
Iirc it wasn’t built (mock up only)
Honestly I would like to see more variants of Italian Leopards and OF-40 instead of Spanish AMX-30s and their derivatives.
PS in terms AA Italy can still get some nice ones + Romania can help as well:
OF-40 PRTL, CA-95, Gepard (CA-94M), SA-8B and etc.
1 Like
I could be wrong but aren’t these AGM-65Hs?
The resistance of the J-10 is now completely abnormal. Its low-altitude acceleration is not as good as that of the F4, and its high-altitude speed of 1.5 Mach at 5,000 meters is nearly 1 minute slower than that of the F16/15c. This is obviously not in line with reality.
2 Likes
To be honest I can understand both sites with this anti radiation missile thing. I want them because they are cool and for custom battles. But I can understand that they are hard to balance. It is important that CAS is fun to play but also that it gets stopped by anti air. But yeah im not the best ground rb player I mostly play naval and air nowadays.
AL31FN is issued in devblog but what about the canard, is it moveable yet in dev server?
Regarding acceleration someone has mentioned this although it is hard to make an issue cause the airframe is still ‘work in progress’ whilst evidence for faster acceleration is hard to implement.
Bro part 4 required?
J-10A has too many erroneous flight resistances.This is a joke that the flight acceleration capability of J10A is even worse than that of F4.
5 Likes
ahh yes SPAA in ground need to be more useless after missile nerfs
As long as they still are jets the 4. or 5. line can still used move and no new line is needed. Different would be if swiss prop planes would get leaked aswell
Not really. These are used project by NovA. So nothing from gaijin officially. The romanian planes are from NovA aswell.
2 Likes
I don’t play much ground and have always sympathised for the anti CAS proponents.
I personally want anti radiation badly to use against AI in Sim EC.
I’d be very happy with the following solutions or a combination there of:
-Split Ground RB into Ground RB and Combined RB.
-Massive spawn cost for anti radiation weaponry.
-Have anti radiation lock terribly bad on smaller stations like used on player controlled SPAA’s. Replace sim AI SPAA’s with larger stations to easily lock onto and blow up.
ARMs aren’t able to see short range sam’s radars. So they will be usless in CAS. I don’t understand what you are scared about
Do not forget about Joy_Division :)
The guy behind Bv155, Bv138 and He 177. He is working apparently on the Heinkel He280
https://live.warthunder.com/post/1054876/en/
8 Likes
GPS bombs is new, more planes get them later
for air yeah britain air is kinda lacking
but hey at least china is no longer copy and paste and Su-24 got added
Dev server has received another update , from .19 to .20 .
tbh I do feel it is ever so slightly overtiered, but that’s a personal take. It’s not extremely egregious, but well
Us getting nothing in Naval is inexcusable, especially considering there are now two entire classes of ship we don’t have in the TT.