I wouldn’t mind waiting the neccesary time to get a bug fixed if there was a sense of order or justice to the process.
Seeing days/weeks old reports being fixed on short notice, while your months/years old report lingers seriously erodes this trust.
@Smin1080p_WT Would it be possible to get more transparancy into the bug fixing process? Maybe in the next developer blog? I believe the community could benefit from an insight into how bug reports are prioritized and the reason why some are fixed faster/slower than others.
G-2 is just the same as the G we already have, the K is like the regular TV mavericks but with the SAP-HE warhead, the only noticeable advantage, or disadvantage of the seeker is that it has the 15x zoom of the 65A with the lock range of the 65B, not useful in game (the AGM-65H we already have in game also has this same CCD seeker, so unless they improve it, it’s useless). In short, nothing new there.
I imagine the A-10C might come with more than just those mavericks, like APKWS and maybe GBU-39s? (I hope…), otherwise it’s not going to be that interesting.
The SAS system was designed to dampen controls, that’s it.
It was never meant to do autopilot roles.
The fact it does attitude autopilot on FBR aircraft is more of a fluke than anything else.
And trim was never coded to work with dampening either.
I’d bet dampening was first intended for virtual joystick where trim and autopilot features aren’t necessary.
Whereas without trim and with a HOTAS you can calibrate your stick to slowly ramp up controls so you’re not jerking your plane around.
Either way, you and I are waiting for autopilot controls to come to War Thunder.
so every vehicle after the 70’s? i mean some where made here does that count as indigenous? or modded vehicles. like where would an Avon powered Mirage III built by dassult for Australia in Australia. where does the Aussie f/a 18 go. they were built in Australia but identical to the USA ones
Ground is a bit different though as you can take multiple tanks into a single match. So tenatively it would give the US 2x AIMS that they could take into a match. Though I think the Australian one does have some mods right?
though they never bothered to add the US AIMS. So…
not true, AB coastal has decent playerbase and there are many who go coastal line to strengthen their high tier lineups. The fact you don’t do that doesn’t speak for the community
also bad example since R-130 isnt even close to top tier. You can compare it to a 4.0 destroyer and then you will get similar reaction.