They also said they would monitor the efficiency to see if anything else needed to be done. Gaijin could also give it a more capable round like the M829A3/4.
It only uses that IRCCM ingame. The AAM-3 IRL used a seeker head with flare rejection very similar to that of a stinger. In fact I think it may have even derived from it.
“Events” are the only times we can get high tier vehicles as rewards. Lower tier ones, such as WWII vehicles should be battlepass vehicles if anything.
And besides, there’s nothing to be disappointed about with the 140mm leopard, why would there be? It would just be the Object 292 on steroids :P
Yea, I don’t mind the notion of such detonations; the issue is that, as of now, shell rooms detonate the very second they are hit by anything, which significantly decreases ship survivability, specially American BBs.
1 Like
The Israelis had upgraded the radars they used to allow for compatibility with their HMD, and presumably added TWS. To an extent, it is accurate.
I might need to ask around for some links, but there should be sources on this if you wish to see them.
1 Like
I hope it isn’t a decrease of the number, can’t find a bug report abot it.
Should be increase it seems)
Spoiler
“Two missiles are ready to fire in external launchers and 8 missiles are stowed in the hull.”
VBM FRECCIA AIFV/ATGM
Btw waiting for spall liners addition for hitfist turret users (including Freccia).
Also still looking forward to see devs get interested in making Italian F-16ADF more realistic with its loadout options.
2 Likes
Historical accuracy for vehicle and weapon specifications has always been a mainstay of WT, though. While not on the same level of DCS as far as intricacies and functionality are concerned, accuracy is still one of the primary appeals of WT.
Not that Gaijin hasn’t made mistakes with specs before, but they’re usually fairly decent at correcting them.
As for balance, that’s why we have the BR system (which desperately needs an overhaul along with the uptier system, IMO).
1 Like
That’d be fantastic. 🫡
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QXz6Gyt7TzIq
These should provide insight. Although the bug report was wrongly denied, it seemingly got fixed after being re-evaluated.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/h5JBSsiTnysr
1 Like
Is there a plan for the AGM-114R? For US helis?
1 Like
Has any of the J10 HUD complaints been reached by devs? its missing target locked symbol unless you get a lock with an IR missile. Its really infuriating to play with in SIM.
If that were the case then how come the British tree is as bad as it is especially with the Tornado ?
If this where Historical accuracy then most of the bugs would be fixed by now and way more 1 to 1 for historical accuracy armour models ect.
As others said war thunder markets themselves as a action game, if you want 1 to 1 for historical accuracy then DCS maybe the boat for you.
1 Like
And yet gaijin still adds vehicles with certains rounds or features added for balance. Again id rather balance be a bigger goal if the nation has no other options as again this is a game.
1 Like
a BR system overhaul would be nice tbh, the X.0 X.3 X.7 system is too limiting for the higher tiers in all modes, naval included.
(looking at japan with their SEVEN 7.0 battleships.)
I mean seriously at that point just increase the BR cap and blacklist all but the earliest jets. Bam, problem solved.
1 Like
The skink were never used by the USA and the project got rejected from them, at this point remove all the tree and make a new one named “world” since slowly everyone has the vehicles of other countries
1 Like
Just tried again, still wont save
Are we allowed a rough figure for the rank or BR? Whether it’s WW2 or post-war?
I’d personally love to see the Geschützwagen Tiger in game, I believe it was passed to the devs a while back.
1 Like
Gaijin: Nope.
You’re able to inform if the vehicle is in fact German or it will be featured in German tech tree as some other operator country that has any relationship with Germany?
2 Likes
It’s great to see the Ram II make its way over to the British tree, I’m personally a big enjoyer of Commonwealth tanks (I adore the Sentinel and AC IV) so being able to use them together will be nice. Also looking forward to seeing the Ram in the British tree’s camouflage colours too.
It would be nice if owners of the Ram would be allowed to choose which version they owned with this addition - I would definitely pick the British option if I could - but I understand that’s likely not practical. I would also love to see the later Ram II with the Mk. V 6-pounder and removed hull MG turret for a nice and strong-all-over UFP, but that and seeing the Ram I with the 2-pounder I suppose would also be limited by needing new models made that take time and money, and probably wouldn’t be popular enough sales to warrant.
More Commonwealth stuff in-game is great in any form though - I hope distantly perhaps for a New Zealand Walker Bulldog in the British tree one day too =)
2 Likes