You better tell Anton he is wrong 😆
Why are you posting this to me ? you need to tell Gaijin’s CEO : )
the cluster bombs I’m thinking of are ones that detonate on impact. I do not think land mines should ever enter the game because that would get so aggravating to be driving along and just get exploded.
2 Likes
That’s fine and I agree.I think I had my wires crossed regarding what was intended.
Just gives more incentive for folks to fire MG’s at them.
Even so, with regard to the anti-infantry SD 2 bomb, it would still be lethal to light, weak, silly, or open-top vehicles such as the M3, M8 car, M8, M10, M13, M15, M16, M18, Super M18, M19, M36, M42, M56, LVT(A)(4), T55E1, SU-5-1, SU-57, ASU-57, ZiS-30, SU-76, SU-85A, SU-100P, GAZ-AAA 4M, GAZ-AAA DShK, GAZ-MM 72-K, YaG-10 29-K, BTR-152A, ZiS-12 94-KM, ZiS-43, ZSU-37, BTR-152D, BTR-ZD, M53/59, ZUT-37, ZSU-57-2, BM-13, BM-31, Archer, Achilles, Light AA Mk 1, Staghound AA, Crusader AA, Ystervark, Bosvark, SARC MkIV, SARC MkVI 2, SARC MkVI 6, Alecto I, Ram, and other similar vehicles.
Furthermore, as already mentioned, the anti-tank SD 4 bomb is a hollow charge bomb, so his excuse is not applicable to this ordnance especially since it was the standard aerial anti-tank weapon of the Luftwaffe:
3 Likes
This says Cluster Bombs Confirmed:
Big if true but I’ve been burned by leaks before (Still waiting for glamorgan)
1 Like
Most SPAA mains are pretty braindead and just sit in one spot whole game anyways.
I hope this is completely wrong on the whole North and South Koreas being Separate. JUST NO.
1 Like
Personally I hope it is completely right on them being separate :)
as a sim player I dislike having to fight planes without a way to distinguish a friendly plane from an enemy plane by looking at them because they are the exact same plane down to the camo
Also, China helps the DPRK with a lot of technical stuff and does provide them weapons; some DPRK stuff is based on stuff imported from the PRC.
The one I disagree with is South Korea to America; I see what they’re going for but its like trying to add another layer to a sandwich that’s already been made. I’d say it fits better in Japan purely for gameplay and location reasons than any political stuff (although they have been trying to not want to end each other recently so). Adding it to the US just seems like content bloat of all time it isn’t necessary
-_- you know they can just add the insignia to the vehicle. They did it with Finland.
Who was trained by the USSR?, most of China’s so-called domesticated vehicles were just T-54/55’s, T-62’s, and T-72’s with extra steps.
I have said this so many times, they cannot put South Korea or any of the Koreas into Japan because of historical reasons, they also cannot ignore this because just adding Korea or either into Japan would be seen as Controversial. To the point South Korea will likely ban the game from their entire country till it’s reversed, they don’t joke around with things like this.
It’s hard enough to spot aircraft silhouettes at long ranges, Trying to see Roundels at anything other than point blank range is really hard. At which point, you might as well just wait for the markers to appear below 800m
Then identify the aircraft. Chances are unless the enemy pilot sees you, then your good to go, however, if they do see you you know their hostile. It’s not rocket science.
Also before you even think of saying anything Morvran, if you have to get into the range where they are turning upon you, then you already have screwed up.
Can you tell the difference between a US F-4J and a Japanese F-4J at long distance?
If I see an F-4J I shoot the F-4J.
So what if they were a friendly?
Acceptable casualties.
1 Like
Or maybe they just shouldnt put same aircraft on both teams.