If that’s the case a report will come soon I believe.
The thrust is slightly less compared to the J-15T’s which I believe is channel loss?
J10 have less channel loss though iirc
That’s for A variant. Nothing solid for the C-variant.
I’m not sure for J-10C. On the same topic, I also don’t know if Gaijin knows how to model DSI intake correctly, and whether it actually changes something ingame.
They didn’t have the J-10C spaded so this is not the max thrust
It should be slightly over 14k spaded
1 Like
has 14044 iirc
low countermeasures is the thing holding it back from being 14.7
pl12a was definitely needed, pl12 simply doesnt have enough reach for top tier when your fighting against much faster jets like eurofighter.
note: f18e should not be 14.3 in its current state, gripen e is a much fairer comparison
1 Like
I’m not sure if there’s a report on this already, but I don’t think there is, so could someone who’s familiar with how to format reports properly make a report on the hud not displaying where the target point is on the j10c?
oh yeah i have an idea! let’s only just change 0 km/h thrust and make it WORSE than the previous engine in most other speeds for absolutely zero reason! my name is john gaijin and i can’t make engines correctly!
i am so extremely pissed at how they’ve essentially made the engine worse at high speeds, yeah sure +800 kgf on xray view for emotional support is very helpful gaijin, love to see the bs
Gaijin:
There’s no way this thrust curve is accurate wtf
yeah im sorry but if we don’t get this changed im actually quitting war thunder due to how bad they
assume these things, im actually confused on who’s in the team making these FMs and engines
Ws10a was already heavier than al-31f not surprised ws10b would be heavier
WS-10B was supposed to have lighter internals than WS-10A.
I’m hoping this is just placeholder thrust curve but knowing Gaijin…