KD88 perhaps a kh59 copy stuff with a ir seeker. IDK why gaijin hids this AGM while it’s not stronger than kh38
There’s no reason why the C-701 shouldn’t be a small AGM with a 29 kg payload, so its explosive charge should be smaller. The C-704 is the same, and in terms of effectiveness, it will be: C-701 < AGM-65 = C-704 < KH-29
We could have already had the C-701 on the J10A, but it’s not Russian equipment, so it’s not a priority
It’s 2026 and the Chinese nation still doesn’t have a national AGM !!!
3 Likes
It’s like the story with the LS-6 250 IR. How long did we wait for a glide bomb with an IR seeker when other nations already had this kind of bomb 6 or 8 months earlier? It’s the same with Chinese AGMs. I find that Gaijin really isn’t making any effort to add weaponry that isn’t necessarily stronger than others, but just equivalent :/
I prefer CM400AKG, 5 mach speed with 200kg warhead :)
4 Likes
And also LS6(ir)(250kg) should have same store configuration with gb3
Gaijin could do it, and controlling those missiles isn’t complicated: make sure that the anti-aircraft defense bots have the ability to detect and destroy large AGMs, or even that certain ships with radar could defend themselves against anti-ship missiles.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Xx8UOZNPsKQ
But hey, we have to wait 4 months for the next big update to get yet another new F18, copy-pasted F16 and Su30 parts everywhere, that’s really what all the players want!!!
The development team realized that modern Chinese equipment was more efficient than Russian equipment
5 Likes
I’m waiting for the YJ-83 and KD-88, even if they’re not as fast as the KH 38 or 29; they’re still the main AGM missiles that China currently uses :)
I meant the one that moved EF and Rafale to 14.7, which meant it didn’t have to face any ridiculous planes.
Frankly, the J-10C, with its radar bugs fixed, had performance commensurate with its BR. It seems like the J-10C mysteriously received bug fixes later than other aircraft, leading to a decline in its performance compared to others. If it then received the PL-12A and WS-10B, it feels like a setup, or “match pumping.” It looks a bit manipulative.
1 Like
I am certainly looking forward to the new missile and the new engine. However, the PL-12 is already a sufficiently powerful missile, and I question whether there was truly a need to update the PL-12 to the 12A.
Finally.
doesn’t it have kind of low thrust?
If that’s the case a report will come soon I believe.
The thrust is slightly less compared to the J-15T’s which I believe is channel loss?
J10 have less channel loss though iirc
That’s for A variant. Nothing solid for the C-variant.
I’m not sure for J-10C. On the same topic, I also don’t know if Gaijin knows how to model DSI intake correctly, and whether it actually changes something ingame.
They didn’t have the J-10C spaded so this is not the max thrust
It should be slightly over 14k spaded
1 Like