Challenger 2 needs to be brought to developers attention

I also thought its armour was chobham packs ?

1 Like

so chally 3 12 with better gun and engine then black night

1 Like

The worst thing about British top tier is the line-ups. Yes the Cr2’s are underperforming but so is everything else at the top. The Apache is great but is lacking a good cockpit, the Harrier is missing MAW (and some other stuff probably), the Tornado is lacking GBU-12’s, the Air Defence and Anti-Tank System is not a great Air Defence or Anti-Tank system, and the Stormer HVM is what it is.

I’m going to make a small post on fixing the ADATS in a few mins.

1 Like

Don’t forget Starstreaks have been unuseable for months now.

The same missile which we are forced to use if we want an SPAA at top tier…

But don’t worry, the devs are taking it seriously, apparently!

4 Likes

What do you mean chally 3 12?

Adats will not be fixed. It was already made to the state devs deem good, despite sources. For example missile fm. During missile nerf update Adats was much worse than now, unusable as a at or aa. A source was provided where it shoots a target down. Missiles behavior was seen there. Devs decided that somewhat middle ground would be what we get.

even on the apache

2 Likes

chally 3 would be br 12.0 ish

Well yes. The thing is Cr3 we have now is just new wersion of Cr2 LEP. But upgrades are 1500hp engine and transmission upgrade., stronger turret armor(new turret is not here yet), gen 3 commander driver and gunner thermals, lws, l55a1 smoothbore, aps. Hull armor is the same

i’ve seen it have aps

It can have it. It is a what if situation. Just like all Cr2 can have enforcer or iron fist. But they do not have in game. Because it is possibility
Here is the trophy

image
You can see the way it is mounted is sub optimal because it is still a prototype

1 Like

ADATS post if anyone wants to say anything

Once i get home i will hop on it. Im too tired rn

DU penetrates deeper because of the way it ablates.
It “self sharpens” and shears when it erodes staying pointed, W mushrooms and increases its surface area at the tip reducing penetration capability.

This is of course minor differences. But technically relevant.

Yes according to primary documentation the Chobham turret of Vickers Mk7 is severely underperforming iirc

Edit: whoops meant to reply to the guy below

2 Likes

Starstreaks only work on helicopters occasionally. The proxy fuse just doesnt work on planes. I submitted a report and they were like “oh we know about it” from 2 months ago.

I tagged some evidence where my missiles literally just noclip thru some kind of mig i cant remember

Du is less dense then tungsten but tungsten doesn’t self sharpen

Are these docs unclassed? If they are where are they?

It lists the wrong maximum penetration and that’s slightly annoying, as the maximum is clearly 652 from their screenshot. 326x2.

1 Like


Says it stops apds and apfsds over an arc and then lists a bunch of CE things it stops.

As far as the specificity is concerned i cant tell you. But its KE coefficient should he the exact same as challenger 1 since they use the same arrays. But as far as how thick they are im
Not sure.

These are declas