CAS problem

[RunaDacino]

Improve the SEAD mode, make it viable at all technology brackets. Boom, done.

Also, start fixing Enduring Confrontation bugs and give us better missions. Boom, done. Oh, and make an RB variant.

When I want to play my planes, some of which I paid for, I play air modes.

When I want to play with my tanks, I don’t want to be coerced into taking out a plane (whose controls I have utterly butchered and cba to keep a ARB/GRB optimized control setup anymore). If I have to take out a plane, I’ll go back to ASB EC.

Which is what I’ve been doing the past few weeks/months. I try to play GRB, I see there being like at least 8 planes in the air (adding up friendly and hostile), “Return to hangar” and go back to flying ASB.

[warrior412]

@GALWAYLION

I’m sorry, but CAS players are obviously in the minority.

I do not see any real basis to this comment honestly. Considering all the tankers who fly we see, I’d suggest the opposite is true.

Based on how many people visibly use AFs and GFs, I’d speculate support for CA is likely closer to 75%+ than <50% or lower.

When Gaijin releases the surveying data, we’ll find out I guess.

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@GALWAYLION

At least you are honest enough to recognise that Tanks Only would be the best thing for the game, but it won’t happen because of people who rely on hiding in the sky to get free eliminations.

Huh ? Don’t put words in my mouth please.
I am against TO mode.
I don’t mean this to piss people off, but i think it’s the best for the game.

[RunaDacino]

@warrior412

I do not see any real basis to this comment honestly. Considering all the tankers who fly we see, I’d suggest the opposite is true.

Based on how many people visibly use AFs and GFs, I’d speculate support for CA is likely closer to 75%+ than <50% or lower.

It’s vital to remember that not all who fly and drive want to do it at the same time, or in the same game mode type.

I love my planes. I don’t want to use my planes while driving a tank.

I have mostly aircraft hours played(244h SB + 200h RB), not tank hours (145+35+16).

This does not mean I want a combined arms mode.

This means I’d play tanks more if I could actually play them without being repeatedly told “just spawn CAP if you don’t want to be CAS’d” (to which the answer is: “OK, I’ll go fly planes in dedicated plane mode.”)

[warrior412]

@RunaDacino

It’s vital to remember that not all who fly and drive want to do it at the same time, or in the same game mode type.

Yes–it is difficult to gauge exact intentionality without consultations.

That’s why I used the word “speculate” and will emphasize that it’s not a definitive determination. The percentage of WT players here for CA certainly isn’t 100%…nothing in life is ever 100%.

Even so, I tend to believe more people come to this CA for CA than not. It’s the logical expectation.

[GALWAYLION-live]

I’m aware you’re against it, but by the way you’re talking, it seems like you abuse CAS.

[GALWAYLION-live]

Just because people use CAS does not mean they wouldn’t like a TO mode. I use CAS because it’s essentially a necessity at this point to grind two or three seperate tech trees just to have a line up for ground. TO mode would allow tank players to play tanks and not deal with no-skill players who rely on bombs to get elims.

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

There is no “abuse”.
It’s a legit part of the game which i enjoy, same as tanks.

[gangsterism]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

I am against TO mode.
I don’t mean this to piss people off, but i think it’s the best for the game.

based on this i propose that air RB is fully removed

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

Ok ? How is that related to ground RB though ?
ARB needs a rework anyway in my opinion, it’s boring af and i don’t like it.

[GALWAYLION-live]

TO should be a part of the game, we would all enjoy that

[Hudler]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

There is no “abuse”.
It’s a legit part of the game which i enjoy, same as tanks.

I’m gonna say this every time i’ll spawn AGM

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@GALWAYLION

TO should be a part of the game, we would all enjoy that

No, a part of the playerbase would enjoy that and nobody knows how big that part is.

@Hudler

I’m gonna say this every time i’ll spawn AGM

Using tools the game gives to you, such abuse.

[ULQ_LOVER]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

Using tools the game gives to you, such abuse.

Of course!

That is why such tactic exists

C&F tactic

I would like to present, the best tactics in the game for people who don’t like: Being uptiered. Playing modes they don’t like. Playing maps they don’t like. Being on disadvantage. Tank gameplay as it is. So how does it work? You create a line-up with one reserve tank and just air units. It doesn’t sound hard, right? Q. What kind of planes can I use? A. In order for tactic to work all the time, one of the planes have to be +1 B.R. than the rest. Then, You need to have a fighter with bombs a…

For big bombers like PE-8 or Lancaster, You are required to only cap a zone and make a kill/assist in order to spawn in it. Sure it is well balanced when it comes to destroying multiple ground units without them being able to do anything about it.

[GALWAYLION-live]

Clearly it’s big enough if you’re so scared that it’ll ruin your fun of abusing CAS.

[ULQ_LOVER]

Like You can’t make a statement saying that adding TO would make current gamemode worse without admitting that the playerbase wanting TO is significant

[Hudler]

-pls Add TO
-NO, majority of players do not want TO, only vocal minority want TO

next day

-pls add TO
-NO, everybody would just play TO and current GRB would die off

Every day - new mental gymnastics from cas abusers

[ULQ_LOVER]

It is the same going over and over with the same arguments going over and over no matter how much You are going to show and provide

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

Again, all of you knew what to expect in GRB as a combined arms mode.

You are probably the same people to move next to an airport and then complain about noise.

[ULQ_LOVER]

Nah.

I’m the one who is using the air and with success when it comes to Ground RB. I’m just honest about how things really are