Can we stop throwing bones to air abusers in ground realistic?

You didn’t, you responded whilst it was being posted.

You’re ignorant and beyond reasoning. Stats don’t record everything and your want to paint someone out as bad, is just plain dismissive and ignorant of the discussion and the points made.

Because you can’t accept those points at all, in these months, it’s made it predominantly clear that you genuinely are unable to disucss or debate anything without punching someone in the gut for the sake of it.

1 Like

I’m saying about posting a replay showcasing what You have just talked about.

There is nothing about stats.

I’m not even talking about recording it but posting a link to server replay showcasing it.

1 Like

You can check the replays yourself, I’m not going to pull one out for you…

It’s not uncommon to have this sort of thing play out, you’re very demanding and jabby, but you really aren’t genuine, and that becomes clear after a while.

If You make a point that You can do ‘x’ You are the one who should prove it.

As again, Your point at the moment is as valid as flat-earth theory. If it isn’t uncommon then You should be able to eaisly just post a one server replay link to it.

1 Like

It’s valid as it’s a known thing. You ignoring it is just you being disingenuious.

This comes back to the point I made initially about SPAA being a deterant, and an interference… You didn’t accept that then, and now you seemingly do, but you’re only wanting me to post up another replay/video so you can say ‘Na’ to it.

It’s one of the main purposes of SPAA, and you can’t accept it because it’s not listed as a stat, and I have to make effort to record me doing something to satisfy your want to ignore the point.

But back to the actual point I was making, it doesn’t matter if I have stats, screenshots or anything that you deem as ‘proof’, the fact that I can hold an opinion, means I can hold that opinion, and as insulting as it may seem to some, there’s a need to tell people to actually use the vehicle that’s there to save them… Be it air or SPAA, fact is if you don’t control the airspace, then the air will control you.

And if you refuse to do anything about it, then you deserve to be having a hard time in your game that you wish to play.

Player choice issue, and there’s no helping those who don’t want to help themselves.

And I know things too, so now we have 50/50.

Yea, I will be waiting for that link to server replay as it is not uncommon. Isn’t it the second time You refuse to back up something because ‘reasons’?

Damn you’re septic and unengaging.

Damn, You don’t understand that when You are making a point it is a normal thing to back it up by evidence, especially if this is not ‘uncommon’.

I have provided evidence to all things I have said.

And please remember, You have replied to the comment about tanks.

1 Like

Tanks include SPAA… Duh.

Stop gatekeeping because you trying to belittle the role of SPAA to only being able to get planes on front on shots is ignorant, and more dumb than anything as if you are in that situation, the fact is you fired too soon or sat in the open, thereby misusing your vehicle.

Ground units include SPAA. Tanks are not SPAA.

You have Light Tank, Medium Tank, Heavy Tank, Main Battle Tank. SPAA is a different class of vechicles.

But good to know that the talk was never about tanks to begin with, so Your reply from the beginning had no point.

LOL, so pathetic… Tank tech tree has SPAA in it, they’re there to use.

Use them.

Your argument is only to have an argument itself. You cannot take on board anything I say because you are that caught up on being righteous.

Learn some discussion methods, because what you’ve got going is merely you huffing your own farts.

There is no tank tech tree in the game, there is ‘Army’ one and it has different classes of vechicles.

  1. You reply to the comment about tanks and talk about SPAA.
  2. You still refuse to provide anything backing up what You have said.

Please next time, read carefully what You are replying to.

Like that You have to back up what You say? Yea, I have done it already.

It’s about tanks and that covers the SPAA… You have them, and you choose not to spawn them so therefore you are going to get bombed…

Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out…

Pretty bloody basic.

We’re not bad people for using the game in the way it’s meant to, and getting you.

It doesn’t.

SPAAs are not Tanks. You can’t turn Your tank into SPAA.

Top notch bad faith and ignorance there…

1 Like

Sorry but if understanding that game has different classes and that when discussion is about ‘Tanks’ we talk about ‘Tanks’ not ‘SPAA’ is bad faith and ignorance, then I can’t care less.

1 Like

Nope… You’re playing a fool again… Stop it.

If You want to discuss SPAA then talk about SPAA, not tanks.

I will still be waiting for the links to server replay showcasing the ‘uncommon’ thing You have described.

1 Like

Bro, kinda pointless to discuss with them. i already provided so many evidence and proof on how SPAA can easily deal with CAS, still be able to use the tanks after your done with SPAA duty and suggestions yet they still demand and cry out for TO because of CAS being OP. One can say, “you just die cuz of being in the front lines so of course CAS will not kill you,” or “bad positioning”, which to some extent yes. However, I kept spawning on tanks just to see what would happen to increase the chances of getting bombed…well, spawned on tank and still died to CAS 3 out of 13 games or so while spamming my tanks/SPAA and finished the match in each one, didn’t do a single CAS run in any of them. Just as my little bro said, WT are full of glory seekers…and don’t care about team work or being supportive, they just want the kills without any challenges in a battle and cry in chat about cheater this or that. He also said they are lazy to deal with CAS, which i also agree with that. I told him to watch his teammates in games and see how they play, these were the results he got from: Too many glory seekers.

2 Likes

All is right, but You should take into consideration to what he replied to:

Which if I remember correctly, You have even agreed to.