And what does this have to do with the lines you quoted?
LOL.
Hmm, who was going on a nice tangent with this “insulting” thing?
Again the double standards.
I mean not hard to see why…
This “argument” is used often by them. Like there would be a handful of SPAA, that would be absolutely useless in TO (they could still scout tho), so because of that 5-10 or so, everyone must suffer.
They would have a use in the “combined” mode.
No. This is simply BS.
Isn’t air basically already this?
Regardless, you do not have to fight a different army branch in Air, while TO mode is needed, because there is a different army branch that is significantly stronger than the one the mode is named on.
???
Another M-51 OP please remove it “argument”?
What would be the issue with coastal in naval?
You mean the shell that has the same(ish)/worse pen than APHE?
This would be horrible. Imagine getting spawncamped by CAS at the start of the match that you can not counter because they have long range flying dildos…
Because SPAAs are not effective, and only air can effectively counter it ->need to grind another tech tree.
It still does not change the fact, that if you die to it, you had no chance to fight back or defend yourself.
Because he knows that with TO implemented, his easy and free ground kills would disappear.
All the 76 and 57mm versions have 15mm turret roof, not just over the breech.
Not just one, but most of the time many of them. Machineguns have this interesting feature, called “multiple shots in a second”…
Why so?
So is that an indication that TO would suck too? Because this is some high level BS there.