Can we stop throwing bones to air abusers in ground realistic?

yea i dont want them to make a TO mode there will be other issues and were back at the forums
it will still be a metal grinder at 8.0 br+

But no issues for You if You want to play combined ;)

gamemodes and map sizes are the problem they are same as early tank release which was great for ww2 tanks

we have rangefinders and they are useless and laser rangefinders just get the user killed if you have the laser warning

You are wrong

I will say this once more. I am not in this for a debate/arguement/discussion to prove it is or isn’t overpowered or unbalanced. I am asking your opinion to collect information. If you continue to be hostile about it, I will simply stop engaging with you. I chose to ask you because you are one of the vocal people in this debate.

What angle of attack on a T-34 would you consider to be unrealisticly difficult for a normal player to score a kill. The weapons used would have to be 20mm or above, as the highest penetration .50 caliber round will not penetrate at around 5 degree angle of attack at ranges that a plane could successfully pull out of the attack.

off topic

Where am I hostile? I’m just pointing out things without naming or bad calling anyone.

I don’t understand the question, sorry.

last time i flew planes seriously was with my original account in 2014 before tanks were just added i dont have any planes in any of my line ups never had they were always considered a handicap in GRB back in the day

and honestly against maus t54-47/51 m103 etc they were kinda needed at times

Yet if You don’t want TO, You can just not play it.

Nope, they were not

? i want cas removed the maps are too small plus theres no excuse now with everyone having apds heat/fs and apdsfs at alot of brs

edit CAS is just another annoyance really gotta deal with a 3+ mile away heli just hoverin and guiding in agms or high orbit bombers etc

This is why I said that. I’m asking questions to gain your opinion, not to refute/debate/counter-argue or make a point. I know my answers to these questions, but I want to know yours.

Ok let me try to rephrase it. What sort of attack would you consider performable by a pilot on a tank while being able to successfully pull out of the attack without crashing. So a low angle attack at around 30 degrees relative to the rank, higher angle at around 60 degrees relative to the tank, or a 90 degree straight down relative to the tank.

You can go vertically at the enemy and still pull it out.

Yes, but what attack would you think is performable by an average pilot without crashing. I am trying to see if more advanced maneuvers, such as a dive perpendicular to the ground is, in your opinion, able to be pulled off by and average pilot.

Sorry but I don’t know about average player performance, so I can’t answear it.

That is fair, I appreciate your cooperation in this. It has given me some points to think on.

2 Likes

picking and choosing which hyper realism functions to have in a arcade game with novelties added is ruining it guys i think 6 years of doing this would allude to that fact

at 6.0-7.0 br and higher if the small maps remain then get rid of CAS if they rework the entirety of it then CAS would potentially be needed and be fun too

There were early accusations and presumptions that ULQ could not fly and that is why he wanted TO mode. It was logical but, in his case, incorrect.

He may have an agenda as to why he wants no CAS but much of what he says about the beauty of the GRB TO game on the odd occasion we get one is a very good point. Lets not forget how good GRB with no planes is compared to WoT.

Best games of GRB I have had were when there was little or zero CAS and that is coming from somebody who loves a X6 kill in the Pe8.

1 Like

man last week i survived two carpet bombings from that d4mn plane lol must of had the mini nuke still locked

1 Like