I thought You were with ‘adapt to the game’ argumentation.
Your all acting selfish m8
Not to mention that McDonald’s will allow You to just take cheese if You want
You can customise your order, even remove the gurkin
But
Adding a new game-mode is nothing hard or an option like for night battles, especially that it doesn’t require much changes.
1 Like
I did. And when it no longer fitted what I wanted I tried sone more then made the decision it was no longer for me.
Thats an environment option that and may be differnt to the core of the game engine, i dont know how the game engine is made up
You can always suggest what in Your opinion should get changed/added and see if there are others like You.
There could even be an issue with ownership writes, or some other contradictory issue its an old game.
So it could be a case of unable to unless they creat a modern game engine rather than a case of not wanting too
You gotta give those tanks with shitty optic or not having range finder a chance to thrive bro, what an IS-6 gotta do if you repeatedly assign it into maps like Sands of Sinai, I thought we only get a small chance of getting a one-cap-point narrowed map when playing 9.0+? I only had like one narrowed alaska before reaching my 45000 event points, then the rest were mostly open space maps like the large european province, fields of Poland that you get f by heli or A4E/SU-25K because they saw your muzzle flash or the hit marker because you get shot by enemy 9mm pistol.
Do you mean if WT adding a TO mode, they will get sued by WoT?
Oh, it is more complicated than that and is already referenced in other topics/threads. This is more player attitude than anything the Devs can do and the current direction of travel does not show any let up.
Not WoT
Reference is 8.0 max in my play. As I played lineups I would use suitable vehicles depending on strengths/weaknesses and the current setup and map (nations and version).
I got sick of 1 cap Domination games and refusal to do anything but zerg.
Sadly if You want a proper teamplay, You need to play i squadron.
1 Like
Indeed, I never managed that and bar my mate during the AB starter years I “soloed”.
Team can work, they were some of the best games especially when the enemy seem the same.
But my issues were more general approach/attitude/playstyle, not people avoiding thinking of the team/winning (which is heavily nuanced since many things can happen in matches).
Here is a link to some of gaijin’s history. Independent of gaijin wiki
Huh? 'Bout what? If you have followed the other thread you already have my PoV on the reason why TO mode would not be a thing ever,…
→ after event-tests of 2015 shown a change in WT official replies.
→ they won’t do it because : Design/marketing/current implemented vehicules aswell as balance is blocking TO mode to ever happen.
→ Gaijin will is not to add TO mode, because it is the same type of gamemode than any other War games based on vehicules only
→ Gaijin uses the fact that combined arms also are made in others games(Battlefield series,Arma series,…), and currently working in both WT and said games.
→ fact that having both modes spread people unevenly is known,… because most players todays are far from knowing how the game works already.
→ TO mode will not be a solution into solving ODL
Those are the most important points i see against TO mode.
3 Likes
Im sure theres many more reasons. The main thing is Combined Arms is the core of the game.
There needs to be an official sticky, so that even if you start CAS issues thread, your get a suggestion where to post