Your previous post was full of such things…I’d have an easier time picking out the parts that weren’t petty attacks on others (it wasn’t even just toward me!).
Um, no.
A) I didn’t choose to talk about RB, the threads have been centered around the premise of an RB TO…so that’s the thread, not I.
B) I have no idea when last you played RB…the data sheets don’t say.
If you haven’t played RB recently, that only strengths the point I made (you’re in a poor position to speak on RB).
I haven’t checked into your AB record nor care about my own if that’s what you mean. (I haven’t played AB with any frequency since 2014 or so…I’d estimate perhaps 100-200 AB AFs games in the decade since, though even that is probably a stretch (almost 0 AB GFs games ever)).
As for RB GFs…well, I must chuckle if you’re trying to deride it. My record is well above average. :)
It’s directly related given that you’ve suggested that’s what’s needed for (your vision of) CA in the AFs modes.
Lmao
How is encouraging TO advocates to put together a rally to demonstrate/practically test (albeit informally) the idea of TO naysaying?
That’s probably the single most productive nudge TO’s ever gotten, haha
In RB? Not according to the documents…according to your dossier, you have:
- A total of ~40 RB games played in aircraft
- A total of 140 RB games played in tanks
- According to your comments, neither of these tallies is even from recent use
We’re talking about RB matters here, so please try to reconcile this all or admit that you’ve been going on about RB matters with only AB insight to work off of…the modes are very different.
Whatever experience you might have in AB with aircraft/SPAA is all but irrelevant to RB because the meta and mechanics differ widely between AB/RB. Even such fundamental, plain mechanics as matchmaking vary completely.
If you don’t understand the vast differences between AB and RB and why it matters, well…that’d explain a lot actually.
Oh boy…this’ll be a hoot. SMH
Nevermind ULQ or his takes…why don’t you speak on your own accord? why can’t you talk about the matter?
You just said you have played both aircraft and SPAAs, so what need is there to involve ULQ?
You say aircraft SP costs are too low a hurdle for obtaining the aircraft and that the players who do obtain aircraft are ‘bad’…so nevermind aircraft for now, let’s ask you about tankers:
What do you have to say about the guys who have their tanks (at least 2 GFs spawns are guaranteed by SP costs) and then do absolutely nothing with them?
Are the 0-2, 0-3 tankers ‘bad’ because they get nowhere with vehicles they’re given or what? What’s the deal with that?
Not at all–I’ve been sensible, balanced and mature here. I’ve served as the ‘adult in the room’ here and in other TO threads that have gone off the rails before too. You haven’t seen me attacking other WT players for playing the CA game of WT.
If TO advocates were a little more collected and not so eager to attack other WT players, we might have seen TO realized when Gaijin put forward their proposal in late 2019…it was on the table.
Lmao
Again, there is no such thing: there are WT players (which can be broken down into a variety of real categories by mode (‘pilot’ in AFs modes, ‘tanker’ or ‘tanker who flies’ in GFs, ‘sailor’ or ‘sailor who flies’ in NFs) and that is the overarching truth: all players are ‘WT players’ in the grand scheme of things.
As there are thousands (millions?) of WT players and a large percentage of those in the GFs mode use both GFs and AFs units, there are scores of ‘tankers who fly’…so it’s strange to deride and deny the existence of such a large bloc–you see tons of them in games every day.
No toxicity in what I said…just the hard truth.
If you don’t want me to say your comments are boring and unbecoming, don’t have them be such.
Have respect for others and you’ll do better here on the forums and even in gameplay too. TO advocates don’t help their cause when they deride the fellow WT players they’re courting for support…so why not try a different way after years of nothing?
When you start respecting and stop underestimating your enemies in battle, you do better yourself…you learn to take matters seriously and you play better because of it.
When you stop thinking of the foe who just defeated you as a ‘bad player’ and instead think of how to do better, you’ll do better and are more likely to avoid the next defeat than wasting your time with sour grapes.
See a different approach and you’ll be better for it.