Greetings, is there a plan or perhaps a roadmap to address all the issues present with displays and sensor information?
I am genuinely asking since issues with the JHMCS and DASH III (to name two of the ones I’ve seen reported) haven’t been addressed so far.
I’m kinda curious to know what the stance or process to follow is.
I’ve seen displays such as those often become a static .png of made-up data, something similar to what happens to digital UFCPs or aren’t modeled like the SCP (Stores Control Panel) in the F-16A
Thank you for addressing this as an official. There are many uses of cockpit MFDs as they give ‘extra’ useful information that adds up to situational awareness which in return cripples the pilot if they are wrongly implemented. One of the newest planes, Gripen E’s MFD map is a good example to this. Are there any roadmaps to address such issues? And are there any other ways for us to do in order these issues to reach to the developers as the problem might not just be that ‘they are lazy’ but they are unaware?
Sadly I have to say that as GM I have zero influence on tech/dev, and no additional information, power or weight in such matters…
I’m just a normal player as everybody else when it comes to such things. = /
But rest assured I battle on: Sometimes successfully (see CCRP for F-111), other times not so much (CCRP for F-4).
It’s always frustrating to see what reports get actioned on and what doesn’t. You can make the most perfect report and it goes ignored for months → years but then if a report isn’t up to the exact standard it’s shot down in minutes, or worse of all the worse report gets accepted and then the older report with better sources gets flagged as duplicate.
Or to see some new reports sorted immediately but others of the same issue but different aircraft rot. My personal example being the radar target lock box for the F/A-18 being accepted in 20 minutes and fixed the very next dev update but then the report AV-8B+ radar lock box went ignored from the Seek & Destroy dev server and also during the Sons of Attila dev server.
My thoughts exactly. It would be nice to know why certain matters are not being seen, some actively ignored and what influences the devs to take action in certain matters. As @Schindibee said, same issue in different planes, one is ignored, one is not.
This 1 is fixed ))
It drives me crazy that the community focuses on stuff like this.
Community focuses on everything.
Question is what devs focus on fixing…
What that people want accurate cockpits?
Money, cash, mula, dough, dosh. I could go on.
Show them primary documents pertaining to an aircraft they don’t deem worth fixing, “we have examined the data and don’t believe it’s possible to match this performance with the current model in game”
Well like obviously devs, that’s why it needs to be fixed…
“We believe this is a marketing lie”
“Our sources say -insert absurd number / quote that doesn’t match any known sources- and no we won’t provide our source”
lol well they provided their source to me on my latest report…
It actually contained data that supported my report and discredited their reply.
Yet it’s still not a bug… seems like there is a lot more at play tbh.
I think just general incompetence to be honest. You see it on so many reports that get thrown our or just flat out ignored.
Like my latest one that had nothing to do with VNE maximum / limiting Mach number.
It was just to do with cockpit vibration for sim battles.
I should a primary document saying there was no change in buffet or vibration as Mach 1 was exceeded.
Their not a big reason was “ the VNE limits are correct”
Like dude never said they weren’t?
Maybe try raising it with some other tech mods on here. Sometimes you can get your point across clearer since you have a chance to actually respond to whatever comment is made.
I’ve talked to a few already.
damn, no one knows that the F-2 ADTW has a bug with the TVI in the HUD which isn’t even accurate.
Literally everything)))
(Looks at the Eurofighter xD)
F-18 Stores-screen issue
and Tornado RWR issue been marked as accepted