All you do is post bait after bait. The problem is you.
Lacks quantity and quality usually
these are supersonics. tier 6 attackers mostly end in a limbo where their bases are taken by airspawns or face 9Ps (downtier vs uptier)
I think you’re missing the point of the post. I’ve implied its more about stock grind rather than general playstyle.
My win rates are nothing out of ordinary, so you can’t blame me for making teams lose.
Fighters/interceptors using bombs are strike fighters.
Fixed it for you.
We understand that you think it’s about stock grind but I personally have never ever wanted bombs to stock grind a jet, except the F-4M because that’s straight up painful. The majority of players are the exact same. You can’t blame them for thinking you just want an easier access to bombing considering your previous posts and your reputation on the forum. We have nothing against you but many people just feel you’re a troll.
1 Like
That in no way means you shouldn’t use them, on the contrary you use them to get more, rather than bombs
Then why not improve the quantity and quality of stock missiles of fighter jets instead of giving silly bombs?
IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO KEEP YOUR MORBID AND RABID OBESSION about BOMBING IN FIGHTER JETS
Please make a suggestion about ‘remove all of strike aircraft and bombers from this game’ at the same time
because those ‘disabled halfbaked fighters which can do nothing but bombing’ are wasting your team slot and stealing your precious bases from you.
I meant, Stock modification needs to be improved.
Maybe getting bombs is better than getting nothing.
But your construction of theory and your reputation are malicious enough to make every comment you write sound null and void in terms of a troll.
1 Like
In a healthy ecosystem that would be the case.
But it is impossible to ensure balance of so many planes in game.
Some planes like super mystere B2 are horrible to play (I’m sure some of you are gonna cherrypick about how it’s the best 9.0 whatever), that bombs give them hope for grinding
In a ideal world fighters shouldn’t bomb.
But grind exists, and some planes are hopeless beyond straight line performancr like smb2.
YES.
That is needed to deal with BR adjusting and balancing, not giving them more bombs.
I apologize if people think I’m a troll. It could be that English isn’t my first language, and my style of writing can be considered tone deaf and “aggressive” to some.
In asian languages, the ordering/formation syntax can be different, which leads to uncanny readings.
Then just remove the whole modification system from Warthunder.
Your English has been rather good in my opinion, no need to apologise. It’s more your takes on some subjects in the game. Overtiered F-16s, your habit of bombing in fighters like the J-7D, the F/A-18 being fine at 12.3 etc, it goes against the general consensus of the game and their players. A lot of newer players feel the way you do, and some of the more experienced players such as myself (I’ve been playing for nearly 7 years) feel differently. I’m not saying you are inexperienced and you should play the way you enjoy, however a lot of your takes are similar to the reasons that this game has gone dramatically downhill, and we want to avoid that as much as possible.
1 Like
I actually agree with you and @Pangolin_Fan
But I’ve said before; the game is f2p and there is certain profit incentives in the modification system and BR compression. There is no way the developers will give up these, so it is better to cooperate and offer concord (协和 in my language; it means harmony, cooperation, mediation and reaching deals with both groups)
You’re not wrong, there’s also the people who think that this game should only be PvP. That’s why we need a dedicated PvPvE gamemode which isn’t sim so that people can fly what they like.
I personally think the current mode, is okay. Save for smaller lobbies and perhaps removal of [operation] maps.
We naval players (especially arcade) understand this very well when the developers, who tend to be top-down decision making decides to make big changes to a mode.
“Everything is a nail to a hammer” applies here.
A PVE mode would end up like coastal naval or tank PVE. Either overpowered AIs or useless AIs with barely any rewards; usually there is nothing in between so I don’t trust the developers in this one to make a enjoyable mode.
Lots of people read this particular post and think I want to base bomb for life, which is only partially correct.
I want to unlock better missiles to improve the PVP potential. Because for those who didn’t base bomb, it’s actually not very reliable. I think sometimes it’s easier to get a kill instead.
1 Like
Just… it would be great if OP didn’t make tons of wildest claims.
- Defending J-7D because nothing but worse bomb capability compared to MiG-21bis
- blaming F-4EJ and MiG-21S for going faster than his J-7D with bomb and no missiles
- claiming F-16A is overtiered.
as examples…
That is why we need better stock missiles instead of stock bombs.
We still have awful stocks from rank 5 till rank 7 (Stock missile improvement was only happens in rank 8 exclusive)
Also, There are some dedicated fighter/interceptor with not a single bomb at all (F-16ADF or Tornado ADV can be examples of it)
So, providing stock bombs for makes fighter jets suffer less will be nothing but a double whammy to those who can’t bomb at all, and dedicated strike jets/bombers.
I really hope you need to double or triple check before writing a post.
Then the problem will be a lot less happen.
