Playing with bombers is simply painful, whether it’s because they’re all made of paper, or because fighter can reach the same altitude in seconds, or because of high BR
In short, it’s best to just remove the bombers from the game because playing with them is simply impossible.
1 Like
Play them in arcade. Most of them work nicely in arcade. (Or sim perhaps too?)
Realistic air is a team deathmatch, for which (most) bombers are simply not suited.
1 Like
the b-17g is 6.3 im sim (is simply over)
They were when 30mm cannons were as effective as 20mm cannons now.
Now even a single 20mm will easily shred a bomber by just hitting tail or wings a few times.
While 20mm cannons carry way more ammo and have superior ballistics.
37mm cannons are supposed to be bomber killing guns but even they don’t blow bombers to pieces but just cause lethal fuel fires.
You could trade a N-37 for a 20mm Hispano and you effectively have a better weapon now with higher RoF, better ballistics and 4-5 times the ammo.
Seeing a B-17 getting demolished by a Yak-3 in a single pass is just comical.
3 Likes
playing bomber is just pain.
1 Like
They said there would be a buff but who knows when
No, they could only be effective when they have a legitimate way to win matches. Even if they get to bomb the base, it doesn’t matter. And if you turn it into GunshipThunder, you are no longer realistic.
So without changing the victory conditions in realistic, they will remain unsuited.
That is why I point to arcade. There you can win reliably with using bombers. Not with all bombers, but with many of them.
2 Likes
Whilst i agree from a general perspective i am not sure why you needed 25k battles to come to this conclusion 😂👍
Flying exclusively WW 2 BRs in Air RB my first friendly advice would be to avoid using bombers during grinding events. The lobbies are full of (often squadded) tankers with rather poor skills flying aircraft with IC spawn focusing exclusively on bombers - trying to score whatever it takes.
In addition the flood of untrained grinding pilots (lootbox grinding on top of event) causes way shorter matches than usual. As a result you might have no chance to drop as you were forced to fly a detour to avoid the masses of BP Mosquitos and masses of strike aircraft wiped out all bases and the enemy team is killed in 6-8 minutes - or your team got killed equally fast and the whole enemy team is hunting you…
If you like the B-17s - use the 4.7 version and hope you got paired with JP (B7A2s) AND Sweden (BP Mossie spam) AND a full downtier. If you want to use higher BRs use the G8N1 - solid damage model and highly effective defensive 20mm turrets.
If you just want to relax - use the 4.0 B-18B. Up to BR 4.7 matches you score almost guaranteed 888 points mission score as a single 600kg M50 kills every base. Sideclimb 90 degrees away from center map and come in high (8km) and fast. I haven’t lost a single B-18B in the last 6 months.
Have a good one!
3 Likes
I play because i like the World War II era bomber, and I’ve kind of finished the American line already.
1 Like
hot take (for ARB), A buff to bomber health or defensive armament wouldn’t make a difference.
If you plan your routes carefully and shallow climb you should be able to reach bases 80% of the time.
The problem with bombers come after they drop their bombs and need to reload.
They need to drop at least +4km of alt, bombers produce lots of lift believe or not and they usually don’t dive well.
Even then landing and rearming doesn’t help, since now you need to make a bomb run with no alt, no time, no speed, no climb… and with the enemy blind hunt active.
Bombers need a way to rearm mid-air since they take so much time do descend and line with the runway that the battle just ends.
Bombers would also benefit from a rework to bases, No more bases spread out all over the place, only 1 base with infinite health would provide with an infinite ticket drain, you could choose 2 extremes with bombers:
1-fast but low payload(usually around and below medium bombers), reliably reaches bases but needs multiple runs to make a difference
2-slow and heavy payload(some medium bombers and up), to reach a base may be riskier but it will pay off pretty well.
also even now, some bombers need to sent a little up in BR. (almost all of them german funnily) specially bombers like Ju-88 A-1, he-111 h-3, Me-264, B7A2, SB2C-4 / 5. last one is either remove bomber spawn or push BR.
Of course a lot more of them could come down too
And of course like 90% of planes, bombers would benefit from the removal of spotting via allies and also longer battles.
4 Likes
Arcade not so good. The fighters usually know where you are because of the weak fog-of-war.
Surviving is often just luck if the fighters just can’t be bothered to climb.
Agreed. Every time I’ve tried to re-arm, the battle was over before I could take off.
3 Likes
There‘s really not a lot to do for bombers other than fly straight, drop bombs and open fire against attacking fighters.
Since their purpose is to drop bombs, while for fighters it’s to shoot down other planes, their play styles don’t match very well.
Destroying all enemies equals a win while bombers can’t really win games anymore.
When they could the outcome was basically decided at the start of the match.
Realistically the mission should just end with no winner or loser.
You just get rewarded for accomplishing objectives and doing well.
or bring back the good bomber maps like the one where you had to fly across the English channel to bomb targets, that was great in big heavy bombers.
It used a version of this map, but with more land on the France side:
Lots of time to climb to altitude or to descend to the runway. I think last time I played it I did 3 or 4 RTBs, games are just ending too fast these days, especially with the “everybody gets an air spawn” nonsense.
3 Likes
Tbh I feel in sim 6.3 is dead enough that people won’t bother you.
Well.
You’ll have Ju-288s show up and gunship you down. That BR range is dominated by Ju 288s.
I do recommend sim though for lower BRs. Stuff under 6.0 avoids Ju 288 hell and flying high OR very low (avoiding detection) both work quite reliably if you aren’t predictable. Plus if you’re highly aware and proactive with gunners, you’ll be able to swat a lot of fighters away because firing ranges and accuracy in sim is MUCH lower for fighters than AB/RB. Some more experienced fighter players can hit you from farther out but you’re still at advantage usually.
Also I recommend joining WingalingDragon’s Team Sim discord. He & Krabb_Nation organize custom battles centered around B-17s (big dynamic campaign) and also B-17 (and other bomber/attackers) flyouts in public matches in formation.
Reload -
This is imho a major problem of bombers in gaijin’s alternative reality in Air RB.
From a holistic pov bombers are designed to carry a heavy payload over a longer distance. This required large air frames for fuel, bombs etc. In wt Air RB there are no long distances to cover therefore they carry dead weight. The short distances allows a plain strike aircraft to perform multiple attack runs whilst landing a 4 engine bitch takes ages and 2nd runs make no real sense.
Imho you overestimate gaijin’s ability to implement such a rather complex topic, especially as most bomber players are rookies and survive not even their initial attack run.
From my pov heavy bombers are “one and done” aircraft - meaning that multiple runs are pointless due to more or less non existing survival rates.
So instead of circumventing the reload issue it would make way more sense to increase the mission score and SL income (like 20%) in case that a aircraft designed to play PvE manages to finish a bomb run in a PvP setup by landing and repairing - as a kind of a bonus. If the player tries then a 2nd run and gets killed without any game impact he should lose this “mission completed” (base drop and rtb) bonus AND the “i got killed” 135 points mission score.
This might help to reduce the number of free bomber kills late game.
You might think this through. Technically seen are base markers nothing more than hints where enemies will pop up. At least in theory 4 bases spread over a larger area increases the chances that a smart bomber pilot can drop.
A single bombing point is an invitation to a turkey shooting, all you have to do as enemy fighter pilot is to wait around this point - classic. “Lions camp the only water hole” scenario.
As soon as bombers get realistic damage models and gaijin eliminates the artificial gunner spread of defensive turrets we can talk about bomber BRs.
The problem with BR increases of bombers is not the performance at a 0.3 higher BR - it is connected to the BRs with base health changes (like 2.3-2.7 or 4.7/5.0) which triggers higher TNT requirements AND the full uptier frequency.
Example:
I would have zero problems with a BR of 4.0 for the BP B7A2 - simply because it would kill most of the extremely annoying BR 2.7 (B-29 & I-153P) or BR 3.0 (Yak-1B spam) downtier scenarios AND enemies get less nimble and therefore easier to kill at 5.0.
But the base health jumps from 4.7 to 5.0 (=imho no base kills possible then) and you multiply Yak-3 opponents. In addition i can’t wait to face 4 B7A2s and 4 J2M2s when fighting JP at 5.0…
Edit: I face the base health issue every time when i use the 4.0 B-18B. Including BR 4.7 a single 600 kg bomb kills every base, and i have 2 of them. At 5.0 i need both to kill a single base and i have a lower mission score and SL/RP income…
1 Like
safe exit zones from tank arcade can be modified for said purpose.
Bombers players simply need to learn about route planning, to avoid or at least don’t be such convinient SL during the initial climb and contact. Once a bomber reaches the backline and the bases (maybe 1 base isn’t the best), IF no enemy decides to chase a bomber all the way to the backline and let their team die and/or sacrifice kills on the long run (which I found very rare personally idk about other people experiences), the main furballs of enemies have probably dropped almost all altitude and the bomber could just fly in a line towards the rearm zone and do a second run without sacrificin so much time since a lot of enemies are ground pounding, RTB, dead and in some unfortunate case climbing back up but now even closer to map center, which means less time to intercept.
In short, bomber players must stop seeing bombers as automatic SL farms and more of a sidegrade in gameplay focused on tactical pathfinder towards objectives on the initial moments. they must realize not all bombers are like JU-288 Cs, where you fly to a base, bomb and maybe not die.
1 Like
Delete “bomber” - the player base is progressing (up to rank III) way too fast and is unable learn basics of Air RB.
Basically in every match i see plain stupid actions (like landing on undefended forward airfields or spawning at airfield due to not disabled “bad weather spawn” or head-ons in clear energy advantage - just to name a few).
You can’t force people to learn - just give incentives to act in a “better” way. WT is like irl - just assume that most people around you are retards.
Same here - there is no “must” - Air RB is designed to be attractive for casual players, the whole monetization / reward structure is evidence enough…
1 Like
A perfect example of a bomber player playing a great match in a 4.7 B-17E in a full downtier:
https://warthunder.com/en/tournament/replay/451151916054728164
Sideclimbing above 7 km, staying out of the center, using the non-existent contrails, showing a high level of situational awareness, trying a 2nd run and shooting down a T-18B with good gunner skills.
His only mistake was that he tried to bomb bases despite his team had a irrecoverable ticket lead. All he had to do was to stay alive, bomb some stuff in the center and avoid getting near a base.
With sheer luck i survived a high risk attack from 9 to 6 o’clock low and got him 40 seconds before the timer ran out.
WP!
2 Likes