I can almost read the Irish accent lol, its dripping from the words
1 Like
Well it’s not like I’m from Co. Galway or anything. I am called “Gal” because I dress in drag and show me knickers for a pint. I added ye as a friend anyways, now you can’t be a loner with no friends. You get one.
2 Likes
I’ve got a few already, just none to back me up when I say stupid shit on the forum
1 Like
I have been violently sick all day but this one sentence cracked me up so hard that I can actually breathe again
Thank you for this gem
2 Likes
Feel better soon lol
It’s just my seasonal immune system hydrogen bomb, a couple of ibuprofen and a lot of flintstones will make whatever little bug it is have an existential crisis and be gone by the end of tomorrow, but thank you nevertheless
Anyways so it won’t get flagged as off topic:
Sure, though it’s a bit hard to think not of when I see “Bomb loads should be restricted to one base” “Bombers are overperforming (unhistorically” “F-16A is overtiered (12.3!)” “Air vehicles need TK off” “Annoying F-4EJ rocket spam” “the airfield repair zone needs to be much bigger” “Fox 3 is unplayable for most players” “SARHs overpowered in Air Arcade” “Ka-50 is overtiered at 11.3” “Why no AB mode for WWI event” “Base bombing / ground targets need to be easier in top tier” “nerf radar missiles” “helicopters are unfairly nerfed” “Naval ammo rack mechanic ruins the game” “Mirage F1C is overtiered” “Hull down meta sucks” “battleship bots make this impossible for cruisers and stock ships” “Naval mode overrun with OP boats/ships” “torpedo spam - fox 3 of naval” “naval maps are too big” “airspawn makes it harder to grind” and finally “I will not fly CAP anymore against 12.7”
Its always either a question or complaining, with very few controversial outliers, your posts are just dominated by it
I’m going to end this with this: Warthunder is a game of skill, opportunity, and luck. The Q-5L had the luck of having the opportunity to get the second base. We do not need to arbitrarily and artificially start nerfing stuff just because you don’t like it, I fear what WT would look like woth you as the head of Gaijin and I sincerely pray it never happens
I can always rest easy at night knowing the most absurd forums posts are made by the same person every time.
4 Likes
Only thing missing in his litany of sob stories is a violin…
1 Like
We have gotten close enough though, he wants the B-29 to face MiG-15s (NRP Fagot which is Bassoon in a few languages, mainly Russian and Spanish) and the Bassoon is close enough to the violin, being one of the harder instruments to play
And no, the term is only similar to the slur in pronunciation, they mean two completely different things
1 Like
personally i was thinking the last t was silent or something
Im pretty sure it is in the Russian pronunciation (Fay-go) but Spanish its Fa-gote
Dont cite my sources
And it’s Fagott in German (Don’t cite my sources either)
1 Like
I wanted to be the idiot with terrible takes, but he always beats me.
I don’t know, man. The F-16 is over tiered, it should be fighting only MiG 19s and MiG 21s, since that is what it fights anyways. F-15E/I should be 11.0 as well, because it cannot realistically fight Eurofighters and Rafale, since again, the F-15E/I only fought MiG 19s and 21s in the Middle East.
1 Like
Yk I honestly think the F-22 should be put at 12.0 when it’s added, cause it’s only ever “fought” F-4s over Iran and is obviously outclassed by the Su-27S
(Fun fact: the F-22 is actually older than the MiG-29 9-19)
1 Like
Don’t forget about the F-14s, and while we are at it, let’s have everyone in NATO have the F-22. It makes zero sense, but since they are all in NATO, that means obviously they have all flown it at least once. Therefore everyone gets it (just without the bombs, worse missiles, no HMD)
Hell like most NATO countries rely on US made weapons (cause we forced them to) so might as well give everyone every US thing ever, though US is supposedly gonna leave NATO, better give it Rafales and Eurofighters as a parting gift
1 Like
Eh i’ve had a decent time with it
These are threads, not individual posts. I make tons of posts (non topic starting) that are not complaints.
Honestly we need:
US
Germany
USSR
Commonwealth
Warsaw Asia
NATO Asia
Whatever Italy’s equivalent would be
France
Scandinavia
Middle East
Instead of what we have
Nations unique enough to have their own vehicles without being C&P deserve their own trees (so Germany Russia France and the US) and those those that could be reinforced with subtrees could be just mixed into one regional tree (like how it’s accepted GBR will get Canadian or Australian vehicles or how Sweden will get stuff from Finland, Norway, and Denmark)
Especially for sim modes, a sorta “NATO v WSP” would work really well if each subnation was given its own area depending on their actual alliance (so we wouldn’t have Chinese M2Ks in Sim despite them being from Taiwan, a very not friendly to China place)
I’m pretty sure Japan is just Japan and Thailand, China gets Taiwan and North Korea, I don’t think we have anything South Korean though (at least not in air)