Im pretty sure it is in the Russian pronunciation (Fay-go) but Spanish its Fa-gote
Dont cite my sources
And it’s Fagott in German (Don’t cite my sources either)
1 Like
I wanted to be the idiot with terrible takes, but he always beats me.
I don’t know, man. The F-16 is over tiered, it should be fighting only MiG 19s and MiG 21s, since that is what it fights anyways. F-15E/I should be 11.0 as well, because it cannot realistically fight Eurofighters and Rafale, since again, the F-15E/I only fought MiG 19s and 21s in the Middle East.
1 Like
Yk I honestly think the F-22 should be put at 12.0 when it’s added, cause it’s only ever “fought” F-4s over Iran and is obviously outclassed by the Su-27S
(Fun fact: the F-22 is actually older than the MiG-29 9-19)
1 Like
Don’t forget about the F-14s, and while we are at it, let’s have everyone in NATO have the F-22. It makes zero sense, but since they are all in NATO, that means obviously they have all flown it at least once. Therefore everyone gets it (just without the bombs, worse missiles, no HMD)
Hell like most NATO countries rely on US made weapons (cause we forced them to) so might as well give everyone every US thing ever, though US is supposedly gonna leave NATO, better give it Rafales and Eurofighters as a parting gift
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Eh i’ve had a decent time with it
These are threads, not individual posts. I make tons of posts (non topic starting) that are not complaints.
Honestly we need:
US
Germany
USSR
Commonwealth
Warsaw Asia
NATO Asia
Whatever Italy’s equivalent would be
France
Scandinavia
Middle East
Instead of what we have
Nations unique enough to have their own vehicles without being C&P deserve their own trees (so Germany Russia France and the US) and those those that could be reinforced with subtrees could be just mixed into one regional tree (like how it’s accepted GBR will get Canadian or Australian vehicles or how Sweden will get stuff from Finland, Norway, and Denmark)
Especially for sim modes, a sorta “NATO v WSP” would work really well if each subnation was given its own area depending on their actual alliance (so we wouldn’t have Chinese M2Ks in Sim despite them being from Taiwan, a very not friendly to China place)
I’m pretty sure Japan is just Japan and Thailand, China gets Taiwan and North Korea, I don’t think we have anything South Korean though (at least not in air)
Something similar would be great in sim. It would prevent alot of the issues with captuered/identical vehicles on both sides. And being able to use multiple nations vehicles in one lineup would be very useful.
China has a single North Korean premium, which is just a MiG 17. It’s like how Germany has a Canadian premium, despite Canada having two SPAAs in Britain. North Korea and South Korea could theoretically have their own tech tree or be a subtree to Japan.
Also, the Italian equivalent would be the Mediterranean: Spain, Portugal, Greece, Turkey, and Egypt could have their own equipment. Moreso Spain and Turkey.
1 Like
Honestly thought there was more than just the shenyang, mb
True, also multiple nations have (unlisted) Israeli premiums despite it being a full nation ingame, alongside Germany having Finnish prems despite it being officially a subtree of Sweden (save for the ItO-90M, which is seen in both Sweden and France, which France’s is Finnish too)
China also has a single Vietnam SPAA that no one uses anyways, but they Vietnamese also has a buyable skin for Russia, despite the fact there is no Vietnamese roundel (which should be in the game in my opinion).
As you said, there’s a bunch of countries’ stuff in other nations, but why fix that when they can just release more Copy-Paste stuff and call it an update.
1 Like
Wait…
Why the hell ‘I need to bomb with mah J-7D so nerf every bomber/attacker for me’ thread derailed into ‘copy paste is lame’…?
1 Like
As a bomber/attack aircraft main pilot (A-7, F-105, F-111, A-10, Buccaneer, SU-17, etc.), this is the stupidest thing I’ve read so far. Not only do I have to wait for the bases to respawn because interceptor fighters are doing what you’re doing, but now you want to limit my bomb load so you can get your bases, trying to make my performance even more mediocre. The saddest thing is that with those planes I get more air kills as targets of opportunity or in self-defense than you do with interceptors. And on top of that, you complain that an attack aircraft only does its job of destroying bases and ground targets
😒
Even a F/A-18, F-16, F-15E or any multirole fighter have more rights than you who are using J-7D and F-14 to bomb bases
The next thing will be use Mig-25 and Mig-31 for that role 😂
2 Likes
The guy should’ve just bought the A5C
The guy is literally arguing that aircraft should only be able to destroy one kill because a Strike aircraft “stole” a base from him, despite the fact that him bombing in a fighter is stealing bases from strike aircraft that cannot fight in an A2A role whatsoever. IIRC, the Q-5L can’t carry any A2A missiles, as opposed to the J-7D which gets 4 but this guy is foregoing all of them for 250kg bombs. He’s just the forums very own jester with how atrocious his posts are
@TIGER_TANK_1 When you eventually get the F-22, are you still going to bomb in it?
Technically it can carry bombs, but last I checked, China doesn’t have a F-22
1 Like