only a blind man no se this bmpt not be “balanced” in 10.3 br first have toptier protection, ifvs with missile is placed in 11.0 and because this not classifield as ivf have ammo box, 4 ataka missile in this br and easely replace it bacause have ammo box, capable to lock air target and have air ammo, for example u are in puma wich is same br and fece to face bmpt where need to shot in front with 30mm gun to penetrate it?
And other question make it realistical for example the big terminator have problem with gun accuracy… when rapid fire the gun bouncing as hell this same need to implement no only nato tanks neret to be “realistical”.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WhhkKb9kL5g
11 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Holy english
10 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I started a similar thread. And don’t listen to those who say the Terminator is on its BR; they just pre-ordered these Terminators and are waiting to destroy entire hordes of Strikers, Pumas, Desert Foxes, etc.
2 Likes
His place is 11.7.
3 Likes
If it gets darts, and even then questionable.
8 Likes
It’s doubtful that it has better armor than the Abrams. That’s doubtful.
Posting same message here aswell:
and this goes not only for Leopard 1A5 but almost all vehicles in 9.3-11.3 range
Its a soviet IFV. Of course its OP, they all are. There isnt a single soviet IFV/AFV type vehicle that couldnt have its BR increased by 0.7-1.0 and it still would be one of the stronger options at the new BR.
BMPs, 2S38 and now BMPT. They are all under BRed
5 Likes
2s38, BMP2s perhaps, BMPT is just a considerably worse BMP2M. A few 40mm rounds into the center of the turret, or a dart from a higher caliber gun, and it cooks. Been killing it off with machine guns too. Sure, there’s armour around the crew, but that matters very little when it can’t fight back, and the armour is not adequate enough to protect the turret bound crew from rounds even below the rating.
Unless they decide to equip it with kornets and apfsds, the rating is fine for it, having played it and played against it on dev.
5 Likes
8 shots is still not great. It’s on par with the BMP-2M, which is much faster and more agile. Doesn’t have APFSDS like the BMP-2M, and is a much larger target.
Like I’ve said on other threads 10.3 is not right, but the right isn’t far off, 10.7 or 11.0 max really.
2 Likes
Throwback to when the BMP-2M was like 9.3 BR.
how would a humble bmp-1 survive at 9.0
how would a bmp-2 survive at 9.7
your take is ass frankly
3 Likes
Quite easily I think, Id say BMP1 is easily 8.7 material compared to comprable vehicles Bradley, Warrior MILAN, etc
and the BMP-2 is definetly better than IFVs like the Desert Warrior. Could easily be 10.3 or 10.7 and it would abrely touch it .
BMP-2M equally outperform most at that BR
2S38 is easily 11.3 material>
75% of the soviet TT could easily have its BR increased by at least 0.7 and it would barely change a thing.
1 Like
play it for a few games and tell me how you feel about it
6 Likes
And you play a few games in the Desert Warrior.
11 Likes
not saying the desert warrior is any good
it sucks ass as much as the m3a3 does
doesn’t change the fact that the bmp-1 sucks so much it could be considered an adult toy
3 Likes
Then drop the BR of everything else down then. Last time I tried to play that BR, they just dominated. Like all soviet IFV/AFVs do
Not looking forward to the BMPT spam rendering 10.3 unplayable in the near future