The problem is Gajin categories are not accurate. Some are APC’s, some are IFV/APC’s, and the BMPT is actually a tank destroyer/IFV.
By definition everything is an IFV but for Gajin sake I’ll just add it.
The problem is Gajin categories are not accurate. Some are APC’s, some are IFV/APC’s, and the BMPT is actually a tank destroyer/IFV.
By definition everything is an IFV but for Gajin sake I’ll just add it.
OH forgot to mention too, even though I LOVE the firework decoration, I am working to help get it flagged as “Fictional” and/or get its code name so that someone can make a mod to mute it. Especially for the RB and SB players. I fully support those who do not wish to hear or see it be given the option/ability to hide/mute it.
There was a bug report, but they closed it. Quote: “Fireworks exist IRL” 🤦♂️
Looks like a suggestion thread needs to be made, I just have not had the time this week to get in touch with a suggestion moderator to create a suggestion thread correctly, and everything that goes with that (I also have not made a legitimate suggestion thread myself yet.)
There is a dedicated thread from @DexterousAlloy and he would like to make a mod to mute/hide it. We just have not been able to find the code name for it yet. If anyone knows the name for the Firework decoration, or knows how to find it, please post the info on his thread, thank you!
ok lets include prem / squad / 9.3,9.7 br.
us
ger
rus
uk
jp

china
italy
fr

sweden
israel same 2
Me when I hear the 50th firework at 10.7

that not the thing,
the thing is he consider them as a light tank while in a other forum he complain about them not wanting to be more cancer.
does side of opinion change evryday ?
they have autocanons, no MBT has autocanons like it. So its easier to compare the BMPT to light tanks than MBTs.
If you want me to compare it to MBT, I can but then that really seals its fate to be 11.7+
well i guess all abrams should be 11.7 for having the same amor.
Ummmm some US MBTs have an auto cannon… and I think Germany does too and they shred. 25mm plus on top of their standard weapons
Such as?
Only one that immediately comes to mind is the Leopard 2K with a 20mm canon, which is good vs light vehicles, but pretty useless vs anything bigger.
I think germany has those in the lineup of the leo 2k
M60 AMBT
MBT 70 (folder tank)
I know cause I’m a menace at BR but even befoe BMPT I don’t play US 10.3-10.7 cause it has garbage lineup.
Leopard 2K and MBT70 have 20mm canons, which I doubt can really do much more than track another MBT right?
Good vs light tanks, but no where near the performance of the BMPT’s guns.
M60 AMBT I had never heard of before and I dont htink ive ever seen them. So probably quite a rare vehicle and its firing HEDP rounds with very minimal pen. Again, I doubt you are killing MBTs with them
It will, go in test drive mode and just from HEARING it you will know, it’s got the juice.
Also, you will kill tanks but not all tanks. Pen doesn’t matter when Gajin volumetrics is trash already hit a spot enough times and it will get through
Rh202 on the MBTs can barely kill lights because of the HVAP.
I’ve taken Leos out that that 20 mm 😭
I’m telling you it works! I don’t like that tank much cause pen is trash if not missiles
I agree to some extend, but you can still rush very aggressively with most NATO tanks if the player uses their brain and situational awareness.
Most players are just like “well I have no hull armor/armor in general so I must sit far back”, because they think mindlessly holding W like a lot of T-series like to do is the only way to play aggressive.
Kind of, it depends on which NATO tank.
People not playing aggressively in a Strv 122/2A7 is a crime against humanity. People not playing aggressively in an Abrams, Merkava Mk.4, Leclerc, Leo 2A5/6 etc while I understand it is a waste of potential. All of these tanks, especially the ones with 5 second reload, are really solid-great brawlers.
However not playing aggressively in an Ariete is fair.
The spall from shot side-on, directly between H-drive & Auto-loader, doesn’t damage either component. Wasn’t the whole implementation of a turret basket module so that when you shoot the center mass of a tank side on, it takes critical damage and can’t return fire?
… they should fix all Russian ERA…it’s buggy as we can see…
In its current state, if the BMPT and HSTV-L are hull-down, the HSTV-L @ BR 12.0, which was used in all screenshots, has to shoot the ATGM & Cannon of the BMPT to disable it, if they both see each other in that time, they will likely disable the others FCS, then repair simulator. If both vehicles are in the open, the HSTV-L can shoot the middle drivers port and pretty much nuke the BMPT. Likewise, the BMPT can disable the gun/tracks quickly or use ATGM and nuke the HSTV-L. Keep in mind that head-on the HSTV-L has to shoot either the cannon or ATGM first, as they are not both in line with the APFSDS when head-on.
Considering these factors, the quantum crew, buggy ERA protection values, etc., they are both relatively equal in strength, so the BMPT should be raised to at least 12.0.
“Driver Engine” because quantum autoloader/ammo.
I mean neither you should be mindlessly rushing in T-series but u like T-series armor which eorks anywhere anytime, rushing with NATO tanks is highly map or rather position dependent.
If 2A4 and 80UD are both rushing the thunderdome lane on advance to rhine, i know for sure whos likely gonna come out on top.
Mfw 6.5 sec reload with 150 lvl expert crew when my shot gets gaijined on BVMs weakspot
(Re posting my reply to your other post, but totally worth posting again 😂 )
Don’t forget! Your test’s don’t even have the Extra ERA modification 🤣 It gets even WORSE! LOL!!!
Leo 1s?