The game isn’t bad, but the mechanics are dogshit. Its like playing with 60 bots and 20 players kinda boring.
1 Like
But the other half isn’t, yeah?. Most nations didn’t even receive that much in the whole year.
1 Like
I played it on console and I can assure you that it’s a mess just to set the commands needed for the land units. It took me months to learn them and modify them to my needs. When I touched enlisted, I wanted to throw myself out of the windows.
1 Like
You quoted things that are all fine.
And the things you didn’t quote are also fine as well.
Not being OP =/= bad.
You can enjoy something that’s the example of what that BR is rather than it needing to be the under-BR’d vehicle[s] of that BR.
1 Like
F/A 18 early is only good because it has AIM-7Ms at 12.3 fighting phantoms, the XM246 is a tank destroyer in disguise, RAH-66 is only good because of hellfires, not the stealth, CLAWS is probably the single worst multi vehicle SAM in game, M10 is arguably doa, the stingray is a rat, and the apache guardian is a worse version of the MI-28, but still an unkillable fnf slinger, besides that none of the things you listed are even usable, and the AIM-120C-5 (which is worse than the B anyways) is avalible to a good 3 or 4 other nations, so its not special at all
Dont argue with wisla. He’s just here to get his fix of emotionally high jacking people who dont know his mo.
all of the planes listed ive only ever seen people say suck so far, the golden shower is a super uptiered F-15C which doesnt even have a good radar anymore being crutched by BOL, and the super hornet is a slow turn fighter at top tier, where slow turn fights dont happen. B-66 is a bomber, which is more a game design issue since most if not all bombers kinda suck, the F106 is a meme at best, like the pancake, and the EFV and T86 are rat tanks the size of a small house
I was thinking more of the premium L2A4s, which as far as I know are identical to each other. Not something like the Strv-122s.
It is strange though, all the complaining about the copy paste but as soon as something new is added it’s all complaints about it’s not C&P because it’s not in their nation, maybe they would have preferred a captured L2A4 be added instead? Some how I doubt it though.
1 Like
T58 and M55 they’re kinda OP, aren’t they?
Don’t even talk about that piece of shit.
Dude dont fall for a debate with him lol. He will talk nonsense until you die of frustration or or passout from high blood pressure.
Also wisla your stats are super sus.
1 Like
imagine mentioning the C5 amraam and EFV lmao
the C5 is flat out worse than an A/B
EFV would still perform quite poorly at 8.7, id honestly put a bushmaster 30mm on a huge platform with no armour (but with a stabiliser) at 8.3. its much worse than an XM800T (which i think should be 9.0) but its got better firepower than a fox or scimitar (from firing rate) and is stabilised.
Can see the average EFV still getting trashed by the average fox/scimitar player tho
People can say the planes suck.
That’s an opinion though.
Granted, my cross analysis of vehicles is reliant on people trusting the factors I address.
It’s not a whole lot higher than a general opinion.
B-66 is unforgiving in the same way all 8.0 - 9.3 bombers are unforgiving.
But when all of them are played well, they can survive in most situations.
And that leads into the F-106…
F-106 is the best 9.3 in the game. Like it’s no contest.
If you compare F-106 to the old 9.3 powerhouses: F-100A/D, Mig-19, etc, it’s so far ahead of them.
T58 is exteemely good but at the same time it is a premium, and the M55 is a gimmick more than anything, im p sure most MGs can pen it and it has a good 30 second reload
Ehh debatable, yes having radar guided missiles and IR missiles is nice… if they did their job, they dont really work on anything that uh… moves, not to mention its energy retention is definitely something, i guess.
The F15C and F18E just cant stand at 14.3, even 14.0 would be a stretch arguably, i dont know why gaijin didnt just go all out with the F-15EX, it honestly probably wouldnt even be that good considering that BVR is kinda dead
USSR always favorite child.
Incredible they adding btr but no lav. Its like adding su25 but no a10!!
look with M55 some shocking things happened to me like not having destroyed an M24 or the fanged Kv1 which are impenetrable
Someone should make a bug report for the BMPTs guns not violently shaking out of control when firing fr /j
Doesnt that happens when using both canons? With only 1 firing it should be like the bmp2 (still low accuracy but not that much when using both)
1 Like
Forgot to mention the xm246. That thing is good as well
First off don’t start with the skill issue bs if you want to remain a relevant part of this conversation. Skill has nothing to do with this topic so I suggest you filter before making a fool of yourself.
Secondly out of those vehicles, only half of them are actually good. Most of them are niche vehicles that force you to play them a specific way or be absolutely useless. The t58 is the only one out of this bunch that is overpowered and deserves to be at 8.7 or 9.0.
The new spaa’s have improper radar. The claws having underperforming radar compared to real life, and the nasams being given the same radar as the claws when it should have the upgraded f1 version.
The ifv has poor performance issues such as the common nato hump, poor turret traverse and being a massive target.
The f106 has no proxy fuse, no flares, and can’t use gun while bomb bay doors are open.
The f18c late is a slow aircraft that struggles to make the most of its missiles.
And more that I just don’t really feel like putting the time into explaining.
It’s about quality over quantity. If half the stuff is junk then what’s the point of even adding it…