Yeah Italy could use some love. Lots of nations can, I just wish they could not focus on Russia for a bit and work on other nations. Hell I don’t even care if US doesn’t get worked on, because while we don’t have as much as Russia, we at least have SOME good options. I just want them to stop showing bias to their favorite country and actually make the game enjoyable for everyone. I shouldn’t have to play Russia just to have fun. 😒
you forgot a helicopter
and new f18 , NASAMS 3
1 Like
then since gaijin likes copy and paste at this point for Italy and the United States they can put the super AV
To be fair, we got LAV-AD before the OG LAV-25s.
The best we can do is vote on suggestions before they’re passed to devs, post in the wishlist topic, and provide reasonable rumor expectations in the rumor round up topic.
@MCNasTY_1998-psn
Are you implying all 10 tech trees are Russia?
Cause all 10 tech trees get vehicles added to them typically.
Even if it’s just copy-paste in the case of the Merkava Mk1.
Also there is no Russian tech tree.
@Raptor-Dark
Considering copy-paste has never been a majority of an update, and was only 6 of the 45 added vehicles last update, it’s safe to say Gaijin doesn’t “like” copy and paste.
And russias equivalent? Much better…
This isn’t a valid argument for why the US tree can’t have more meaningful vehicles added. Half of these vehicles are pretty dog water compared to what Russia has received. Stingray, booker, 64E, t58, and possibly the super hornet are either halfway decent, or good. The rest are niche vehicles that really offer nothing in the way of being competitive.
I guess the question is why can’t they roll out bigger batches of vehicles than 2 or so a nation every 3 months? They arent hurting for money.
Because minor nations are massively neglected, and yeah… there are some cool vehicles at 9.3-12.7 that would make playing the main nations a lot more interesting than copy pasted MBTS.
1 Like
They have spent 3 years working on infantry thats why.
once that calms down we hopefully will see more stuff again
I have already seen all the vehicles on the list of possible candidates and I voted for most of them, especially the Hungarian and Romanian ones, but since they are a smaller nation, they will give them with a dropper, hoping they don’t put them as GE/package/squadron, some of the interesting ones.
It was kinda tongue in cheek if I am being honest.
3 years? Damn, isn’t it the same models as Enlisted?
Top 5 light tanks in the game:
1- CV90120.
2- M10 Booker.
3/4- VT-5.
3/4- HSTVL.
5- RDF/LT.
AH-64E is equivalent to Mi-28NM and Z-10ME.
T58 would be 9.0 if it was in the Soviet tech tree.
Stingray is better than the 9.3 option Soviets get.
Super Hornet is average for the BR. That’s okay, cause so is Su-30MKM/SM.
I really wish people would stop acting like whipped dogs about it, we shoud hold gaijin to a higher standard.
They need to develop unique new stuff for Russia because they have not thought of an excuse to C&P Leo2s and F-16s in yet.
Also, didn’t USA jut get a new under BRed light tank too?
enlisted is ww2. this is modern. but likley reusing a lot of assets from HUD and the modern infantry april fools from years ago
yes, I hate enlisted for the fact that he leads a platoon and not a single soldier but if people like it, then they’re happy
T-90M is just copy-paste of T-72A according to the people claiming the top BR Leopards in France, Sweden, and Italy are copy-paste.
And yes, USA got hand-held even more than Soviets.
Cause while BMPT is allegedly 0.7 below its correct BR, M10 Booker is confirmed to be 1.0 below its correct BR by the fact VT-5 is 11.7, and AGS is 12.0.
1 Like
Most people don’t like it, and I expected it to be like Squad, Let’s see how it goes.
Wow… I can’t imagine expecting Enlisted to be that bad.
congrats, half of the US additions you just listed were all DOA.
1 Like