Balancing ground

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
83

I will reiterate my previous statement so that it stays fresh.

This is not about just wanting more vehicles just for the US. This is about gaijin focusing mainly on giving Russia more and more excellent vehicles while half assing other nations providing them with mostly poor performing or otherwise useless vehicles. Russia does not need any more vehicles added. We can go multiple updates without new additions to Russia and they would still be just fine. Other nations need work and I’m not just talking about the US.

84

I’m implying the above statement ⬆️

85

Also what???

Please clarify what you mean by this because this is quite literally a blatantly false statement

86

It was named ussr because the game started as ww2 only and then cold war. Now its jus russia with some allies (like syria). I think they need to change the name to Russia.

87

only .50 cal and equal and thats close range.

88

2 spaa? i only count the tor M1 and that thing can be pretty questionably effective

89

the c13 variants like the c13 sidam would be great too

90

they dont really ‘move’ things like that they just hide them

thats pretty good odds for the chances of a new vehicle being good, cause definitely less than half the vehicles in the game are good, so be more grateful to gaijin for even half your new vehicles being good

i wouldnt say its really that big of a deal, every nation gets their turn in the sun often when subtrees are added to them for minor nations or when they get the new best top tier for majors, amraam slingers, eurofighters and the su30sm/sm2 (but mostly rafale) have all taken turns so far

91

yes they do. This was just an intentional screw over just like class 3 P
image
image
image
image

1 Like
92

Those vehicles are still in both tech trees just you can only have the old ones if you had them before they got hidden and the news ones got added

93

Russian additions: A long anticipated, and very powerful tank in both premium AND tech tree form.

American additions: A light tank at a BR that already has one, and a VERY long anticipated plane . . . in premium form.

The difference is pretty clear. Pretty much all the recent U.S. additions, EFV, T68, F-15C GE, F-18E, have all been pretty sucky.

The only good ones are either A) Copy pasted to other nations (M44, M55, Stingray) or are B) premium (T58 and Fireball).

94

Arguably the stingray was copy pasted to the US not the other way round

1 Like
95

Japan getting Thailand in the first place was kinda dumb. Tbf, the Stingray is one of the few justifiable copy pastes, but it still sucks that less than half of the U.S. TT is even unique.

96

gaijin believes in the greater east asia co prosperity sphere

97

most of the stuff in the tree is soviet so i dont think they should

98

The name does not matter. It’s negligible and really just a misnomer. I genuinely do not care and for all intents and purposes will continue to call it Russian.

99

I count the buk as well but only because it works while the claws is rather useless. So comparatively I would say it’s a useful addition.

100

image

101

I’m not sure how you get over 70% of ground and air vehicles as “less than half” when it’s not even counting the naval vehicles.
And ground is technically 100% unique as it’s a multi-spawn game mode that has lineups, and having even 1 unique vehicle in it makes that lineup unique.

102

cool, the US doesnt operate it though, thailand does, and the variant that the US has in game is a copy of the one thailand uses not even the variant that was proposed to the US as far as i know

1 Like