I worded that poorly, my bad, I meant that with the changes and the T.10 Im getting excited, I’m a simple lass, love me harriers.
Yeah same. I love all the top tier stuff like the F/A-18’s and F-15’s but deep down the Harrier’s the best.
I’m excited to see the T.10. Will probably pick it up for myself if it does end up being a premium.
It would be a counterpart to the AV-8B NA so we wouldn’t just get a GR.7A premium
Basically yes
do you know where US harrier 2 technical data and discusion is?
1 Like
Harrier T.10 unhidden in latest Dev Server update.
Looks to be a pack premium but not sure if it’s a pre-order or not.
Also only 60CMs as it’s missing BOL.
3 Likes
Dude, I just asked @Smin1080p_WT if it was going to be a premium or event vehicle on the Sea Harrier discussion
Ok? And this was just added with the dev update, don’t really get your point?
I mean it was almost pointless asking him <:-(
1 Like
Public ticket about the T.10 having a T.12 skin that doesn’t match the model
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0oStJPXLJGDq
I guess comments/votes can be used to indicate whether users would prefer the two-tone green or two-tone grey camo
Also Smin has confirmed it will have Phimat (chaff only, takes up one pylon) rather than BOL
Use of Phimat instead of BOL tends towards early 90s Harriers (green era)
5 Likes
It should have the BOL，this number of the harrier has lots of photo ,some of them have the BOL,also have the training missle.
To be clear, there is no dispute on the BOL capabilities of the T.10, this is a balance choice made by the developers.
9 Likes
balancing decision?
Su-39 has 192 CMs + IRCM + R-73 at 11.3
A-10C has 480 CMs + All-aspect MAWS + Aim-9Ms at 11.7
AV-8B(NA) has 180 CMs at 11.7 (and is the same airframe)
But Harrier T.10 is OP with 60 CMs + 320 BOL at the same BR?
9 Likes
Very strong argument for making it green if it only has Phimat. Think BOL came to the GR.7 ~1995 after using Phimat on Op Warden in 1993
1 Like
Yeah… This is a deal breaker for me I think. 11.0 or 2x BOL I mgiht consider it, but with all the IR issues the Harriers have… I dont think the T10 will be even remotely playable at 11.3 with no BOL
5 Likes
why not both!
If they limited 2x BOL to the main A2A pylons and the phimat to one of thsoe 2 pylons as well. You could then choose between 2-4 Aim-9L + 2x BOL or 1-3 Aim-9L + 1x BOL + 1x Phimat. I can see the use case for that and it would be perfectly balanced for the BR
Anyone know why I can type on some threads but not others right now and gives me an error code about ‘play a match in game to be able to respond to this post’?
Game servers are dying and I think the forum authentication to make sure you’ve played is bugging out. Wouldnt let me post at all until I logged into the game