It was brought in to give tanks a break from CAS on some games and not all. How much weather can be varied considerably and how much freedom CAS gets changed accordingly. Its a good mechanic. Fog on the ground gives cover to both sides as well. Trouble is so many players just want WT played on a pool table.
1 Like
Love the weather like this. Makes people use their brains more.
Bold of you to assume everyone has reached, or plays, ultra high tier.
It can happen. It least you aren’t fighting in a blowing dust storm. You all would loudly demand that be immediately removed.
As long as they appear in a frequency comparable to actual duststorms etc. I am fine with that.
1 Like
Thats their problem really
1 Like
Weather is weather it varies like maps should vary ,I have no issue with it.
So it is better to make gamemode worse for one section of players in order to give it to others (for some games, so nothing changes) instead of just giving płace for pure tankers and making everyone happy?
2 Likes
Its not a tank battle, its a ground battle. You literally say an identical thing but wxpect a different meaning…
Do you happen to know if this is official or our guesswork?
And due to how random battles are, by chance some might get a lot more than others. Personal experience varies so wildly.
Discourage =/= not allow.
So you say that ground battles and tank battles are the same? An infantry battle is also a ground battle.
So I guess, an infantry battle and a tank battle are the same, too then?
The “Ground” in the name of the mode has only one meaning and that is: the objectives are designed for ground units.
1 Like
Yes.
Supporting? Most of the time CAS will decide the fate of the match, I don’t think it’s supporting, but, almost, the spear of the team if you understand me.
But why force TO to happen only in bad weather?
Why can’t TO just be as a mode or an option light with night Battles? Why does it need to happen „randomly” and not when players want it?
Everyone will be happy. If there is not enough players for creating TO games, just a TO people problem.
Ok, so tanks and infantry are the same.now. I am glad, we could settle that.
This game is not historical, so please stop using such argument.
If TO is not popular then an option to have it like with night battles would not change anything for people who doesn’t want it and argument for TO people would end.
Not to mention that You would not need TO people to have something if the idea was not popular. By trying to ‘solve’ the issue You are showing that the popularity of the idea is not as niche as You claim it to be.
1 Like
If TO idea was not popular then there would not be enough TO supporters to be a nuisance.
Oh, showing true colors.
I have proposed the idea that would benefit everyone and would allow for no longer nerfing/buffing certain things, but yea, let us create a compromise which doesn’t get us anywhere just for You to say: “BUT YOU GOT WHAT YOU WANTED, STAY SILENT NOW!!!”
Sorry but I will be in every topic regarding balance and will talk about it.
Just because You want to provide some ‘changes’ that will ‘supposedly’ balance things out doesn’t mean that no one can criticise them.
I have already showed You that there are going to be people who are against what You want and changes You propose are going to just destroy game for others.
Giving people an option to play pure tanks is fair and good option that would benefit everyone. You just need to not be biased to see it ;)