I’m someone who has all air trees in some form and my most recent initiative for a ground tree is China, as an appreciator of the extensive history of some of these Asian countries and as a lover of both Japanese and Chinese trees ingame, I think the founder ASEAN nations to Japan would be the most ideal, specially Indonesia and Singapore on top of Thailand with the occasional vehicle from Philippines and Malaysia as long as it’s western such as the F/A-18D.
As for China I think the right way forward would be to continue with the addition of Pakistani vehicles as well as other countries like Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia to name the bigger ones.
People saying things such as China lacking thrust vectoring Flankers and whatnot, China operates the Su-30MKK and Su-35S on top of their own domestic Flankers which have better avionics and missiles and they can get even more options for both air and ground from some of the countries I mentioned which can bolster them very well, a few examples below:
Pakistan
• Al Zarrar
• T-80UD
• Mirage III
• Mirage 5
• F-16AM MLU
• F-16C Block 52+
And that’s without factoring in a possible North Korean subtree which would give them a few tanks but also jets such as Su-7, Su-25, MiG-23 and MiG-29.
I think western equipment in China is already plenty enough with the Taiwanese branch giving them options like the F-16 and Mirage 2000 recently and for Japan, Eastern jet options should be limited. Things such as the F-15SG have no business in the Chinese tree when China can already get Flanker variants which are competitive counterparts to a Strike Eagle.
They sure do, I just didn’t mention all of them or my post would turn into a newspaper, anyways thanks for adding that on top of my examples. To add more on my end I really love both trees and I wouldn’t say I’m particularly biased towards one or the other but we need content that’s more in line with the trees’ own essences if you know what I mean, it’s why I believe in case of Indonesia getting added to Japan I don’t think their Flanker should go there, and if it does then maybe as an event or squadron jet in the future
I don’t see the aversion to having flankers only in the JP tree. Sweden has Finnish MiGs, Italy has Hungarian MiGs, China has F-16s and Mirages. Personally I would rather see the Su-30MKM and MiG-29N since they have some unique features and weapons, but I don’t think the tree should have some arbitrary ban from having any eastern tech. Especially when Japan was seriously considering and only a few signatures away from operating flankers themselves.
Oh yeah I don’t mean it’s a ban per se but a little pointless imo when they have western counterparts, I just don’t think they fit with the themes that’s all but I think they should be added as event or squadron jets instead
I think if only 1 should be added, it should be the MKM since it has a lot of western weapons on a Flanker airframe. There def shouldn’t be all the different Flanker variants that Indonesia operated like the S, SK, SKM, MK2, then throw in the Malay ones on top of that.
Hey all. I’m guessing I may be a bit off here but the A-7E (USN and RTAF) should be getting mavericks (2x 65F/G) and AIM-9L. Far as I know it never had 9Gs in Thai service as Thailand never got them. ( And the US one, in the current config, was used used even in '91 with up to AIM-9M!)
It would be another irrelevant plane for air RB as it currently stands ( and it really is in the US tree too) and wouldn’t be a hugely good one in GRB either. The matchmaker around it has changed way too much for it to have a good fighting chance. https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JkaVgkegKjSO Community Bug Reporting System ( this one’s been closed but id beg the devs to reconsider)
Thx for the attention ))))