As far as I’m aware, you can’t make subtree suggestions for specific nations, just general subtree suggestions. But I might make one.
It is possible, the rules say that you cannot put it in the title, for example you cannot put “Argentine sub tree for Germany” as a suggestion title, I would still recommend doing a survey with different options so that people can choose where they would prefer to see the sub tree.
3 Likes
The Argentine F-86F 30/40 were tested with the Shafrir II
As far as I know they never used Shafrir I
Spoiler
1 Like
Ah, good to know. Admittedly, my knowledge of Argentine aircraft is pretty limited, most good sources are unsurprisingly in Spanish.
1 Like
However, you had a great idea here. You should make a suggestion!
1 Like
F16 unnecessary, and too many a4, find 2 variants to keep lol. Also the really modernized one is more 10.7 than 10.3 to me NGL. Other than that looks pretty cool, nice work
1 Like
IMO that’s the most important aircraft actually. Germany lacks a gap filler to go between the F-4F ICE & the Eurofighter, there’s an acute capability gap that cannot be plugged without a foreign aircraft, in this case the F-16AM that Argentine is buying from Denmark.
Of course, we could always try to inject copium directly into our blood system, and pretend Gaijin will add the MiG-29SE because one of them was based on a German MiG-29.
2 Likes
As @FurinaBestArchon said, the purpose of the F-16AM is both as a filler between the F-4F ICE and Eurofighter, as well as a multirole fighter of which Germany currently lacks.
1 Like
I made various BR changes including the A-4C to 8.7, A-4AR to 10.7, and Dagger A to 10.0. Also corrected some errors and improved formatting.
2 Likes
Tornado? That’s a multirole, even if it isn’t that good in its current state. Or add more east german aircraft, I think that’s how gaijin will do it. Also, another tech tree with an f-16 should be avoided, too many already tbh. Also, no filler is really needed between f4f ice and typhoon, tt can just jump straight to it.
The IDS is a Fighterbomber and the ADV is a Interceptor. None of them are multirole
2 Likes
The hell did you get the idea of tornado being multirole from lmao
1 Like
So you are saying remove japanese F-16aj and uk grippen, because they can just Deal with the gap?
And oh yeah, means you are against any further additions of leopards into other trees as well
2 Likes
Wikipedia probably
1 Like
Okay, so lets just ignore EFTs for Italy & UK since they have gap fillers, and give T1 B5 EFT to Germany alone.
Lmaoooo.
They should remove AJ, it’s fake. Plus south Africa is an established subtree of the UK, and they NEEDED that airplane. I have also had a change of heart, I think f16 are ok as long as they are not C or modernized to be close to C, I mean it only makes sense the US gets the best version of their fighters and you guys will get the typhoon in some time. F-16A I’m chill with every country that actually needs it gets it.
I mean… Wouldn’t it reduce the grind to the top? Italy and UK might get more EFT variants, but it’d make it take more time, or they could folder it, time to grind to best version would be same but no one would play the foldered one
why does Uk need the grippen, but japan no F16?
ehhh, you mean like germany should have the best leopards in the game?
Besides that more and more nations will end up getting C versions as well
1 Like
But many nations will have airplanes that can be used instead of C variant. Personally, I find it pretty dumb that there are f-16 and j-11 in Chinese tech tree, and that with some exceptions like the EJ Kai, the USA gets worse or equal variants of it’s own fighters. It really makes it pointless to play USA, I am fine with higher BR for better variants, but most advanced/best version of a vehicle should stay in the tt of the country that designed and built it