but isnt it what you are doing?
i asked u what are we supposed to do, when there is no german option
and you decided to ignore it, i am geniunly asking what shall we do?
We do not have german options for those br gaps
Neither are we apparently allowed to ask for other nations vehicles. You claim Dutch for benelux, switzerland can be its own tree, argentinia part of a future LATAM one.
But who can we look to for solutions when you guys deny us any possible solutions?
I had already answered to that and your last messages before this continuation had summarized the conversation.
I see no reason why you expected a response or felt so entitled to it as to ask for my attention after it was finished.
With that I have nothing more to say here, have a good one.
so sweeping it under the rug like i said, you said
foreign products would be possible. but you fight as at every turn we even suggest anything.
Basicaly we have no nation or anything to point to, while everyone else apparently is allowed to.
Thanks for nothing i guess. you always act like you got the moraly high ground, but when someone points out serious problem that arent limited to air top tier but even low tier, you dodge the matter and dont want to even name the nation you would find most acceptable as a solution filler.
That is just sad man
@Godvana
btw did you try to get this accepted into the real suggestion forum thread?
There is multiple other sub tree suggestions like this arent there?
First of all, this proposal is cherry picking. Mirage3/5, Super Etendard, Kfir, F-16, A-4… ahhhh fuck
If you want to get the Mirage, grind the French TT, and if you want the F-16, grind the American or Taiwanese TT.
For the first pic, he mentions how “We do not plan to add aircraft from the Netherlands to Germany”
It could be because of the question asked but he only said “aircraft” and didn’t mention a Ground vehicle + didn’t specify that it would never happen but just said there isn’t a plan for it
But i’m probably just overthinking it cause everytime i read something like that, it tends to change in a year or so, and it’s always something like: “There wasn’t plans of it at that moment but now there is”
I’m curious if argentine aircrafts will be added tho, only thing that i can see being added there is the PAMPAS and PUCARA
It is possible, the rules say that you cannot put it in the title, for example you cannot put “Argentine sub tree for Germany” as a suggestion title, I would still recommend doing a survey with different options so that people can choose where they would prefer to see the sub tree.
F16 unnecessary, and too many a4, find 2 variants to keep lol. Also the really modernized one is more 10.7 than 10.3 to me NGL. Other than that looks pretty cool, nice work
IMO that’s the most important aircraft actually. Germany lacks a gap filler to go between the F-4F ICE & the Eurofighter, there’s an acute capability gap that cannot be plugged without a foreign aircraft, in this case the F-16AM that Argentine is buying from Denmark.
Of course, we could always try to inject copium directly into our blood system, and pretend Gaijin will add the MiG-29SE because one of them was based on a German MiG-29.
As @FurinaBestArchon said, the purpose of the F-16AM is both as a filler between the F-4F ICE and Eurofighter, as well as a multirole fighter of which Germany currently lacks.
Tornado? That’s a multirole, even if it isn’t that good in its current state. Or add more east german aircraft, I think that’s how gaijin will do it. Also, another tech tree with an f-16 should be avoided, too many already tbh. Also, no filler is really needed between f4f ice and typhoon, tt can just jump straight to it.