Lol?
This is a simple question
It’s important too, especially regarding vehicle buffs/nerfs
If you want something changed, you NEED sources to prove it.
If you don’t, you might as well just talk to a brick wall.
Actually, a brick wall is more likely to get you any results
Yes I agree. I don’t think it even that bad you need to put it down to 12.3. Not sure in SIm though.
Having this ability is next to pointless for a Fox-1 slinger too
A decent sim player shouldn’t have issues with the 60 countermeasures, considering there’s other vehicles with just as many if not less countermeasures at higher brs while sometimes having worse rwr’s and flight models too.
A quick google search would save you further embarrassment.
Apparently he’s complaining and just being rude to everyone and escalating the situation without actually explaining things and refusing to believe the truth. Tires to have a normal nice conversation but he refuses to cooperate.
The only one being embarrassed on this thread is you flailing around insulting everybody who tries to have a conversation with you
There also isn’t anything to google btw. There is nothing on the internet that will tell me that the APG-73 is more or less strong than an APG-65 in war thunder.
Or are you guys incompetent of understanding facts?
Then Gaijin will probably sell the CF-188A IMP I as the next premium jet /j
“O Gaijin, O Gaijin, We pay vehicles for thee.” /s
probably better than We Stand Guard for Thee…
Having a conversation means being able to understand what’s been said. None of you have offered anything relevant.
Take the hint that the majority of you are wrong
Here’s a fact buddy:
All sub 14.0 F-18s are perfectly good aircraft, you just have skill issue.
Here’s a other one; if you want something buffed/nerfed, you need to be able to prove it.
This has been the case with gaijin for years, it’s a constant issue for people trying to get their favourite vehicles changed.
This is why people have leaked classified documents, why the bug reporting forums have rules for sources and what ones are accepted and which ones aren’t.
Think mark, think
I am sorry but that you right now…
90% of your messages have consisted of: “are you stupid?” Or “go read the obvious”
You have never provided anything productive to the conversation.
Please take a look at what you’ve said and think about what it would be like trying to discuss something with a person who acts like you do
And we wonder why this game’s balance is screwed up.
Yes I can agree it has an better Radar and 2x the CM’s and also a slightly better engine, but the difference isn’t that big enough to bring it down to 12.3. Maybe the german one can go to 13.0. It already in a great position for it BR compared to other planes in its BR. Lowering it down will only cause more problems.
not sure why youre siding with OP here. Tbh i dont see why any rational person would side with anyone thats been arguing.
Me watching the Aussies get another TT jet, well, my next RCAF aircraft is added as a premium or more likely, it’s being added as a premium under one of its other operators.
(I am still frustrated that the Aussies now have 3 TT Hornets, and the only Canadian one is premium.)
Hey! That’s one of the better parts of the English version. We used to be taught that it was part of a set of lyrics (that is now changed iirc) that talked about the soldiers from the World Wars iirc.
But now it describes the current events technically, thinking about it.
German hornet radar:
US hornet radar:
what’s the difference between them?
The Swiss one has 20km more range and can track more targets in TWS.
How does this affect you?
Realistically, not at all. Spawns are circa. 70km away from each other in RB maps, so extra range is useless regardless of what missiles you have.
Extra TWS targets? The US one has 10, you can see practically the entire team with that anyways.
That is as long as they are all within your scan area, which happens only if they spawn on the airfield.
Flight performance?
@MCNasTY_1998-psn the literal only part where the Swiss hornet is realistically better is due to extra countermeasures, which isn’t an issue for someone who has a single clue on how to play the aircraft
if you want to complain about countermeasure count, go look at the MiG-29N, at 13.3 with 60 medium caliber countermeasures, one of the worst 4th gen airframes and SPO-15, which doesn’t even tell you if the thing engaging you is a Fox-3 or Fox-1.
Or the J-15T, at 14.7 with just 48 countermeasures which players have been trying to get buffed since the first dev server, guess what happened? Nothing, because there is no proof that it has more countermeasures.
Finally, if you want the US hornet to get buffs, go find sources that prove what you want.
Without sources, gaijin isn’t doing jack shit.
The bug reporting forum is free for everyone to use.
I suggest reading up on the forum’s rules too:
Yes, because it was borned to be built better?
I reckon I explained well about why.
F/A-18C (Swiss) is better than F/A-18C Early (USN), but your take is in exaggration level.
If you want to upgrade, you need to find a technical document instead of stabbing random guys in a forum with insults…
If you dig the internet and find a proper document which can support your option, probably the majority of guys here will support that.
BECAUSE GAIJIN ONLY READ TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS.
Take without any evidence is null and void to Gaijin.
It is plausible to upgrade USN F/A-18C Early in same level of Swiss F/A-18C, but you need documents for that.
Isn’t this simple to understand…?
Both Historical Accuracy and Game Balance are improtant, but
Historical Accuracy over Game Balance.
If I were your drill sergeant, you probably would have ended up facing to the wall /j.
I reckon we need to agree to disagree about this part, since it will open a whole can of worms, as you told.
THEN PROVE IT WITH SOLID PROOF. THAT IS HOW THINGS WORK.
1- I don’t side with OP. I don’t see any rational person would misconcept this.
2- This sounds like bothsidesism, and won’t help with the discussion itself.
