Notice how he ignored everything else in the post.
Do I need to when you think slightly above average is over performing?
like i said he is only deflecting so that he dosent have to engage in a proper argument

oh man the mirage can get one kill and maybe have a quarter of a chance of getting another kill in a match, its over performing!!!
so when did anyone, BESIDES YOU, say that it is overperforming?
show me
He’ll point it to me. Technically i did, but it isnt wrong.
but the f15a suffered so much against 14.0 planes with all their fox3 missiles
so ofc it needed to move down /s
man its almost as if moving stuff down in br instead of up is a bad idea
I think the worst change they did that I haven’t seen anyone talk about, is the Shenyang F5 moving down to 9.0 because why the fuck not, let’s get more chinese whales to spend their small salaries on another artificially underbr’d bias mobile
oops, used old info on this one, turns out it’s been powercrept for years.
how tf is the shenyang f-5 going to 9.0 bad lol. That thing is literally just a mig 17 pf but with 9b rip offs, it is not even close to being on the same level as something like a mig-19pt and has been over br’d since forever
My bad, I used old vids of the shenyang to check out its performance before I found more recent info on it, it used to be excellent but now it’s downright sad to fly, I know that the lim 5p is already pretty good so I guess the shenyang will be the better lim5p then.
Here is a rare one I don’t think many players remember:
MiG-17AS 9.0 - > 8.7: It’s the same as the current TT MiG-17 with the only difference being that it can carry a pair of reverse engineered AIM-9Bs which shouldn’t warrant it being the same BR as the Demon and being able to face the F-4C, F-1, the French F-8E, Mirages and the Draaken in a full uptier.
This idea was also made with the assumption that the 9.0+ bracket doesn’t get decompress, also does gaijin even remember that the MiG-17AS exists? because it was 9.0 when I got it waaay back in 2019
P-47D-25: 4.0 → 4.3
In addition to the change of BR, I also propose increasing its boost pressure from 56 inches of Hg to 64 inches of Hg. Currently, both D-22 and D-25 are producing the same horsepower at WEP with the 56" boost. However, the D-25 is considered to have a marginally worse flight performance than the D-22 due to the larger fuel capacity.
It would be nice to adjust the P-47D-25’s engine settings to better differentiate it from the P-47D-22 in terms of engine performance. That means the D-22 would remain at 56" boost with a power rating of 2,300 bhp at WEP, while the D-25 would use at 64" boost, producing 2,535 bhp. The D-28 in-game uses a 70" boost. Having all three variants modeled with their different boost settings would produce a nice and clear progression in performance between them.
It had been bug-reported to increase the D-25’s boost power, but, while it was accepted, the developers think 64" is a lot and will change the aircraft’s performance quite significantly, so they will deny it for now. Hence, I am writing the proposed change here for now until the next BR changes feedback thread is open, and I will copy and paste this proposal over there.
Now its 9.0…
Identical performance, but the F-5 keeps the 37 so its cool.
Another tech tree jet becomes pointless to play?
The only difference between the TT MiG-17 and the 17AS is that the 17AS carries a pair R3S and the cuban roundels but as I said that idea for a BR change is made with the assumption that decompression doesn’t happen which it really should for that br range in particular
F3h2 9.0 => 9.3
Sorry but no reason this thing should see 8.3. None. There’s a million of these running around and theyre genuinely a massive headache to deal with.
Yes. Which does what to the tech tree version? It obsoletes it entirely and makes it pointless.
No point changing the standard
95% of vics are useless now
Hence why I would prefer decompression because this aircraft is now at the same Br as the North Korean F-5 and suffers from the Supersonics that plague this br range