Add traditional Match Maker to current MM

Russia ,USA and Germany could work well at 6-7 BR with the Pershing and the Tiger 2/Jadgtiger .
You could end at 6-7 BR and start a new era for Cold war if those 3 were all we had.

It is the later nations like France, Italy and Sweden who struggle and need 70s/80s vehicles to pad out the gaps. That is a major fault and a time where the rot started. People like Mahiew can come out with the obvious but they are just describing a problem which is what I am doing and you are doing.

As far as I can see Gaijin took a wrong turn and followed the money. A wrong turn for game play maybe a good one for Anton’s pocket. We are the fool, he is the winner :)

That is what the game is about, money so no point any player coming on trying to defend it unless they have shares in Gaijin.

We could cut the game in half but some vehicles like the Tiger 2 and Elephant maybe Centurion, ARL44 will be in in limbo although we do face them in a full up tier.

Again, with respect to the OP and petty bickering aside, I don’t think there is a sensible work around for it. We are stuck as we are and can only hope things like the M109 get jacked up in BR next update.

All your comments and like minded comments by others are all negative all most to the point of trolling. You are able to find holes in an idea, lets see you be creative and plug them holes, if there is a creative bone in you, which i am trying to do as there are issues

Make good ideas next time since it’s clear everyone here beside 2 people have the same echo chamber. “Game bad, make game wor…i mean “better””.

Yes and no, reason be:

This
image

Would face this
image

And this
image

Would face this
image

However, in a positive light

This
image
(Strv 103 C)

Would face this
image
(T-72A)

This above is an example of being “balanced” most things will not be like this.

2 Likes

The fact you continue to respond to me only tells me that you do not like your opinion being challenged. So any insults you have that are passively aggressive I take as a compliment because I enjoy having my healthy thought processed challenged because it means I am wrong. it also means I can make a better idea in the future.

5 more arguments and you will end up with so many rules that half of the current vehicles will need to be removed from game. Now compare all your rules with current MM. Would it really be better?

1 Like

M4 does face Jagdtiger in the uptier. M18 at 5.7 Faces Tiger 2 at 6.7 .How do you think the British defeated the Jagdtiger with Comets and Fireflies during WW2?

That’s a Jagdpanther, not a Jadgtiger.
The only Jagd tanks the Sherman faces are the Hetzer and Jagdpanzer which both have some difficulties fighting. However, given you got me blocked you are gonna ignore this.

1 Like

17pdrs, that’s the saving grace of the Sherman’s, and they aren’t introduced untill the late bits of 1944, just like the 76 Sherman’s, and then, it’s a small number. Still not very balanced, bet better. As for Sweden, let me throw out another one.

This
image

Would (in game) face this
image

Not to mention it was fielded until the early bits of the Cold War.

1 Like

I don’t think you should continue arguing with the 2 mirrors. There like baked potatoes, already mushy inside always deflecting refusing to acknowledge that their idea just doesn’t work. Or attempts to word it in a confusing way to make it appear like it is a good thing and not a bad thing. However, I applaud you if you do end up continuing.

1 Like

Your putting words in my mouth, what i dont like is being looked down apon with intent. Ie being called dumb. My idea mybe but its probably more creative than anything you have, there are issues and there is plenty of content that is unplayable or very frustrating…

You are a troll with as much creativity as a piece of spaghetti, now just jog on

M2A4 vs KV-1

1 Like

Your ideas speak for themselves and are all regurgitated demands from “remove CAS, make cas expensive, make separate gamemode”, to historical matchmaking. Something that everyone for over nearly 7 years stated was idiotic.

Spoiler

guess what will happend if the historical match been added:
M109, 2S1,2S3M, Leo1A3 and M60A2 will meet the T64 and T72 or they will been disgusted by HSTV-L, Mig23 will fight against the F14A, F15A, F16A (1970s), M3 Bradley, VIDAR and ZTS63(1980s) will meet T80U, ZSD63/PG87 (BR4.7) will try to shoot down the F14B(it has many Paveways to kill target) (1980s), PTL02 and WMA301 will been crashed by M1A2, and the USSR Pantsir-S1 can only kill the Russian Mig29SMT(after 2000), PUMA can only find T80BVM, T90M, CR3(P), Leo2A7V in battle field(2010s), it will be more unblance than now

3 Likes

Oh, yeah, that too, I don’t think it would even be able to side pen that.

Just move along nothing for you here

Ladies First. I insist.

If we do get something that may or may not happen you wont be getting invited

Nah bruh, just give them what they want and see them cry the first match they play it. I’m not trying to be disrespectful, I’m just saying it won’t work.