ADATS, what Gaijin got wrong

No capability to use darts? Not saying you are wrong, but why is that?

actually the irst itself can track in bad weather condition
there was a test in saudi arabia where it was in a middle of a sandstorm, the ADATS eliminated its target without much hassle

i think it has something to do with high velocity or the way the propellant affect it
because the adats 25mm is a modified version so it got some changes
the m242 on the adats was modified to have high fire rate so im guessing its something to do with that

1 Like

I have seen people say it can’t use the belts bit no documentation has been provided to prove that is the case.

so is document that prove it can either
im all for it but gaijin wont if we dont have proof

The cannon itself is an modified M242. No where is it stated that cause it shoots faster that it can’t take certain munition.

APFSDS was cleared for the M242 cannon.

Gaijin be like, instructions not clear, removed from game
{60C8C433-5C37-4FD6-BB63-B7A9AC6745D4}

What was that in reference too?

Isn’t that in reference to it locking?

I was just making a joke in response to MrBombastic’s latest quote

man i wish ADATS was good

1 Like

Gotcha mb.

1 Like

Yet, gaijin accepted a 3rd party write-up as a valid source on the R-DARTER to apply the R-DARTER nerf. In this forum we have already proven that some things only applies when suited.

To an extent - same goes with the franken-hind that is the super hind. Is it a Mk3? is it a Mk4? Nobody knows. I mean, I can really go on a tangent on this one - Like the Rooikat engine performance or the tandem charge on the Mokopa missile system ++++

So far I have only discussed vehicles that I have seen perform IRL, been in and around. Never mind other nations that there is plenty documentation of.

Hey man, you know Gaijin does nothing to buff British stuff. I mean, they nerfed the Fox for no reason beyond some guy in the forums making stuff up.

M735 has confirmed that there is a very different standard of evidence used to nerf NATO stuff than what is needed to buff it

There are a few, one is Identification, the ability to see if a vehicle is friend enemy or neutral, through thermal it can be hard. Contrast if the background is hot. Backup if the thermal is down for maintenance or damaged. Prolonged observation, running a cooled thermal sight requires more power.

1 Like

@Its_Filthy
Gaijin did not accept a 3rd party write up as a singular source for any historical report. There is no fixed bug report on the website about R-Darter that resulted in a “nerf” from my quick skim.

You can be critical of the bug reports IF you both cite them and get the bug reporter to tell you the sources they used, as bug reports hide sources.

Go check again. And I will cite them when gaijin has a better browse function on mobile. Not everyone is at their PC the whole time. Some of us work.

But seeing that you can not find - let’s edit and here you go Update 2.37.0.74

Thanks for proving my post 100% correct.
The report doesn’t disclose the sources used, and Fireball uses quality sources.