Go check again. And I will cite them when gaijin has a better browse function on mobile. Not everyone is at their PC the whole time. Some of us work.
But seeing that you can not find - let’s edit and here you go Update 2.37.0.74
Thanks for proving my post 100% correct.
The report doesn’t disclose the sources used, and Fireball uses quality sources.
Does show source anymore.
When it was active the source was from a 3rd party author that wrote PDF on a general breakdown of South African equipment. For the R-DARTER I can not share any of the pages here though as it is restricted.
If you wanted to know - this was the source as I still have it bookmarked :
Bottom of the same page :
Link to the source that was provided with the change : https://www.defenceweb.co.za/wp-content/uploads/Repository/A-Guide-to-the-SANDF/A-guide-to-the-SANDF-chapter-10-saaf-app-c-equipment.pdf
The M3 ADATS M242 wasn’t actually modified. As an externally powered gun the only change required to increase fire rate is to increase the power of the motor it is connected to.
Self-powered guns will require modification to increase or decrease fire rate, but externally powered weapons (Gatling style guns and chain guns, etc) can have their fire rate increased with additional torque and RPM from the motor.
1 Like
so there would be a chance that it can fire apfsds
the reason that i dont think the US give it apfsds is because of accuracy, the m242 isnt exactly accurate but then who knows
Or a elephant in the room. You know, how it was not a service vehicle
2 Likes
hey we just need sources that say it can fire apfsds that is legit
theoretically thats all we should need but for them to actually add it we probably would need confirmed test firings of it
1 Like
test firing is an absolute nightmare to find given that theres only 2 of them and most test fire are mainly missiles engagement test
I know but it feels like that is the standard of evidence gaijin would need for US vehicle
eg. HSTVL being denied other ammo despite the testing of that ammo likely being done by the HSTVL
bit different than them making up an ammo type for 2s38
3 Likes
APFSDS while nice is really not something that would matter to me because at the end of the day its an SPAA that happens to be able to kill tanks some times
I would much rather improvements to its radar/IRST so that it could actually track munitions for once and see planes in poor weather
it would also be nice if it used radar to indicate where its missile is now that you cant see it past a few km
it’s been far too long already, and pantsir is still literally the best spaa around, gaijin will never change anything about spaa of other nations except nerfing them even more for pantsir’s sake
They need to move the ADATS to 11.0 and bring in the G6-HVM. It’s the only solution
ADATS missile does not match real life performance
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/B67sfyCiIgE1
8 Likes
thats good, in 5 years when they actually fix it the missile being invisible wont be as big a problem
1 Like
@AlvisWisla you gone quiet bro - Generally speaking we agree on most things on this forum but this one kinda went silent from both you and the staff member I initially replied to on the matter of “Devs does not always follow accurate data”.
is there a chance for the MIM to have longer launch range?
the radar is 20-25km range so it should make sense to have somewhat long range missile right?
Radar is 28 km.
No, the missile range was around 10km. Mk. III missile was rated at 12km range.
2 Likes
is there a chance for mkiii then?