U didnt understand
I said israel can have a lot of cool and unique vehicles gaijin just need to add them
For cass just use the spitfires they are great
2 Likes
No I didn’t understand ,sorry.We agree there.My apologies : )
1 Like
israel being an US sub tree is non sense…
imagine adding the captured USSR vehicles in the US tree? how would it be?
and israel can be an independent tree due to how many vehicles it can get already, it would be too big for a sub tree.
5 Likes
Nice, you have my Merkava Mark 4 400 suggestion in there :) I was in the process of making a Mk4 Barak post, but I’m at an impasse as reality and Gaijin don’t overlap.
It is nonsense but not as much nonsense as adding a sub tree to Israel.
israel needs a sub tree.
1 Like
Israel needs a decent tec tree
1 Like
both
1 Like
One thing Gaijin could do is create differing M51 skins like they did for the Tiger 1. There are varying versions of the M51 but the made one of them Premium.There are other versions of the M51 they could use.They dont bother thoguh do they?
1 Like
they would have to add an spaa at 6.0 - 5.7
1 Like
This. Also the KA-50-2 Erdogan. Everyone would love another Ka-50.
2 Likes
They need to add many things that is the issue.
well, i am specifically talking about the pack that you used as an idea, the germany pack has 2 tigers and a spaa in 5.7 - 6.0, so if israel had a pack like this way with 2 m-51 tanks and a spaa, they would have to add a new spaa in the same br as the m-51s
1 Like
I suggested to Gaijin a long time ago making copy paste vehicles more attractive and interesting and maybe selling them as premiums.It was based on the Cobra King and Chinese M4 which I enjoy playing.The Israelis do jazz their vehicles up , some interesting schemes.I would also like more premium CAS. The 5.7 Spitfire is rarely on offer.The Game needs CAS and support at 6BR
1 Like
oh my if you only knew…
1 Like
Just remove the hard matchmaker with USA → baaam, tree is already 80% more playable.
I suggest you take a look at this prototype I made:
And also take a look at this proposal my friend Ofekk made:
They’re interactive demonstrations of what the Israeli TT could look like in its full potential! (Just you wait till I’m done with my proposal).
5 Likes
It most certainly does not. No CM has stated this, and it would be the dumbest placement for a subtree there ever was. I have no idea where you got this idea, and you are the first and only person I’ve ever seen who suggested it going there if anywhere…
Israel’s military connections are stronger with Chile than any other ingame Nation’s relations.
If you don’t believe me, I suggest you take a look at the Forums Suggestion for a Chilean subtree. Germany’s relations are nothing in comparison.
1 Like
You mean the sub-tree where I voted for Latin American tech tree?
Which you didn’t even have my full quote.
All your post did was repeat the same exact thing that was in the post you replied to.
You act as if it didn’t go to a LATAM tree, it should go to Germany. It most certainly should not.