They constantly deny all forms of logic, reason and common sense, doesn’t mean we should accept it.
Never said we should accept it. But we all know how gaijin is.
In first post I’ve mentioned few planes, G.91/A-4E/SK-60. All of them are overpowered in Mixed Battles. A-4E is unique beacuse you can skip whole tree and get it for free while AFKing.
1 Like
I don’t understand how that makes it more overpowered over the others. You are just hating a single vehicle for no reason.
1 Like
Parity BRs is common sense.
Doubling the storage size + all new necessary code to combine the doubled code isn’t worth it.
i dont think it would be such a complex thing to implement. I mean we already have separate BRs for each game modes.
1 Like
What storage size and code lol, they already have all the data and numbers, it just needs to be separated from air RB… I highly doubt a few lines of code are ‘not worth it’ to significantly improve the game or somehow costs them millions of dollars.
1 Like
Gaijin said separate BRs made planes OP in their testing. Which is hilarious.
1 Like
That separation at minimum doubles the amount of code necessary.
It’s not a “few lines”
And it wouldn’t even improve matches by a feather drop; Less than 1% of aircraft would be impacted for largely useless code.
Su25/39s and other high br attackers are really OP in grb. So having separated BR will surely improve the experience.
2 Likes
Would agree with you before nord rework, nowadays they struggle to penetrate SPAAs when you hit them directly.
But still they can be launched from standoff range and G.91 is slightly better platform than A-4E. It lack flares tho so keep that in mind and has to give up one of its guns to make room for nord guidance system.
2 Likes
If you spot it in time.
We are talking about 8.7 grb where SPAAs dont have any missiles. So having flares isnt a big advantage at 8.7 grb. Gepard or similar SPAAs can easily deal with such aircrafts. Since you need to guide it till it reaches the target you will most of the time get in the range of SPAAs.
1 Like
lol Just lol
Su-25 wouldn’t change BR, if anything they’d reduce BR for ground.
Su-25K/standard were made 10.0 because of air RB performance.
Su-25T is 11.3 because of its R-73s and Vikhrs which are useful in both air and ground.
However, Mig-27K is superior to Su-25T for ground battles at the same BR.
So yeah, Su-25s would stay their BRs or drop for ground battles, likely stay.
1 Like
It’s better than any other attacker at it’s BR. It may not be supersonic but it can survive multiple hits. Also those huge rockets are really OP.
It’s a slower F-4C with flares.
1 Like
Can a F4C survive multiple AA rounds and manpads? No it cant.
Yes, im aware. Thad why i think that A-4E with flares and better bullups (bigger warhead) warrants higher BR.
You can but you dont have to, if theres danger, plane can break off at any time and the missile can still hit.
It needs separate BRs alongside the other attackers. Moving it up to 9.0 would make it face 10.0 aircrafts. It does not have any ability to face them. Even in 9.7 arb it struggles. So without separate BRs A4E cannot receive higher BR.
1 Like
AA rounds? Probably.
Manpads? If Su-25 doesn’t pre-flare, then it’s gonna hit.
F-4C can dodge the non-TY-90 missiles.