In one of my replies, I was discussing the actual topic, how the IS-2 is not a good tank, and I brought up one of his other posts, including the M26 and KTH. He did report that one, have to edit it though. In your personal opinion do you think the IS-2 and M26 are good, and the KTH is not
1: IS-2 is statistically one of the worst 6.7 tanks
2: M26 is just, sad at 6.7 (T26E5, T26E11, KTH, all the same BR)
3: King Tiger is one of the best 6.7 heavy tanks, easily.
1: Really. Compare it to other 6.7s
2: Evidence? Compare the four, M26 bottoms it.
3: Not MUCH better, but they are tied I would say. Depends on preference
1: Yes, it does. The IS-2 has an EXPONENTIALLY longer reload, worse armor, and not even that much more penetration. Sure “it can one shot stuff”., guess what, so can the KTH and other heavy tanks at 6.7
2: Okay name a single VALID point the M26 does better than those other tanks
3: I prefer the extra pen on the Tiger II H, they are both very good. I find the E5 more fun though.
Just imagine me in an IS-4m and a you in your great M-26 facing casually in a game, you shoot but you can’t scratch me even if I was standing there eating a sandwich for five minutes straight, I shoot M-26 dies lol. IS-4 or IS-6, just those two are living proof the M26 doesn’t belong to 6.7