Then Russia shouldn’t have Obj. 279 and Obj. 292
Than by thta logic no in game prototype should be in game, and unlike Objects, Sweden never put a thing to develop T-80U.
Objects were developed and trialed by USSR, all while Sweden only trialed T-80U for a short time and it’s smh enough, same with Mi-28A with only having any russian pilot but just few Swedish soldiers being weaponry operators.
5 Likes
Okay, so let’s replace T-80U with the KRV, partial built, partial paper. A development never entered to service. Why don’t we have it? Same with the Swedish AMX-13
Edit to remove flag: Wtf, how is this off community guidelines? And why would you flag this.
You can see such cases have only been removed, german WW-2 paper SPAA is example of that. Additionaly Gaijin was just searching for options and they can be lame at that.
By any case, they will not be removing T-80U from Sweden, same with Mi-28A.
He is a Swedish on copium, thinks trialing for 2 hours is same as owning 1000 Sherman’s from lend lease
3 Likes
Okay, that’s fine. What’s the big deal with it anyway?
Lend lease = borrowing tanks then paying them back at the end of X
Trialed = borrowing a tank or tanks then giving them back at the end
So what is the big deal, I see no issue with it if other nations got these as well, because that could lead to the Sherman VC, Church. III, Panther A, Tiger II (P), T-72, Scorpion, and Schimitar.
Besides, you started this.
Gotta love when the 2S38 empty mass is more effective than the helicopters empty masses. This thing definitely deserves 11.0 and there is no reason it should be there as Russia’s high tier premium. Technically a upgrade to any owners since raising it should allow for a increased rewards multiplier and increased maximum researchable rank. Not to mention the proxy, higher capability gun than the HSTV-L, Proxy rounds, and more. Only drawback it has is the first stage reloading. Ridiculous ammo pool too unlike the HSTV-L.
6 Likes
Mb then USSR get this?
2 Likes
Sure, just not as a Squadron vehicle, because Russia already has 3.
As you can see people are against it, even though it’s fair vehicle exchange.
I wouldn’t care what form it appears in, it’s just that usually such vehicle is squadron
Event vehicle, yeah, Squadron, no, being the fact, as I’ve said before, already having three squadron vehicles, they have no need for more, but as an event vehicle yes. They need to focus squadron vehicles to nations that don’t currently have one or two.
Eh, but they are literal owners of them. Just like any other existed prototypes.
That’s fair.
People are against it not at all because it’s a squadron. They want to preserve the situation when other countries steal vehicles from the USSR tech-tree.
At the same time, they do not create topics for the removal of the T-90S, T-80U or Mi-28a
Agree. They are a total rat of a tank and ruin that BR bracket. Quite frankly, that entire USSR wallet warrior lineup is busted. TURMS, 2S38, BMP2M, and Su25 at 10.0.
2S38 is one shot. It would be a glass cannon, but the cannon is not even that good.
4 Likes
Should be 10.7, but not 11.0 imo. Nevertheless, agreed.
1 Like
What? I have had maybe a couple bad experiences fighting it. The rest is just one shotting it without much thought
1 Like
yeah and its a light tank normally a good play would be stay hull down flank and check before moving to not get killed its main weapon its mobility
23.3 HP/t isn’t really anything special at ~10.0.
2 Likes