Also those have stronger engines so they can actually be called fast compared to the slow cv9040s
26.8 hp per ton and 28.8hp per ton
And the suffer bus a miserable 19.3 HP per ton worse than even the heaviest Leopard 23 hp per ton
Yes but that’s a problem all non missile carrying ifv have to suffer from
Imagine having Even less pen and only 24 rounds in the Ready rack
Which then reload at 1 round per 2 seconds excluding the time needed to actually get the shell into the gun to be able to Fire
While having a significantly worse vehicle over all
Or the puma ifv (non fire and forget missile version)
Maybe I also should Point out again the only tanks with good side armor are Russian which the 2s38 only Very rarely sees
The ZSU-37-2 is at 7.7 with radar
The Falcon is 8.3 without radar
Why is the 2S38 not 11.3 the same BR as the Otomatic given its increased killing power?
Because the Falcon has APDS with like 110mm of pen.
If the vehicle more efficient at ground combat is at a higher BR then why is the OTOMATIC higher?
Cuz it’s light tank vs SPAA and you comparing SPAA to SPAA
The newest Russian 57-mm self-propelled anti-aircraft gun 2S38 “Derivation of Air Defense” can reliably protect the Khmeimim air force base in Syria from small-sized combat drones. Terrorists have been trying to use such weapons in recent days. According to military experts, it is difficult to find a better opportunity to test such a system in real conditions.
You talking about balance in game make developers assing it to SPAA and only then compare it to SPAA
Yes ingame balance is what I’m talking about. It’s given a lower BR rating due to its lack of radar despite performing much better in the role Gaijin has given it.
Why can the 2S38 face the MBT-70?
This MBT was designed in the 70s. It should not be facing APFSDS from 2022. There is no logic for placing the two at a BR where they can see each other.
Stop whining!