ZA-HVM - Technical data and Discussion

why not argue that the turret is functional on the G-6?

image
image

and the ostwind II is iffy
and coelian only had a mockup turret
and the R2Y2s
and the Ho-Ris

5 Likes

Forgot to mention it.
G6-HVM suggestion has been made, wonder how that will go.

4 Likes

Link?

Not yet, as every suggestion it needs approval first

1 Like

Ahh ok fair enough

I’m pretty sure a photoshoped image could make them believe it…

I know that some suggestions are questionable at best, but i want to keep it clean from my part.

1 Like

AAAAND G6 suggestion is gone, wonder what happend.

Shocker

Considering that the japanese F-14 got passed any many other “unrealistic” suggestions, but not the HVM is just crazy. Something is 100% shady going on here

4 Likes

I mean, i give all the sources, suggestion mod says they are for G6, so i make a G6 suggestion and it is denied.
If not for Rooikat, and not for G6 then for what?
Self propelled turret? Maybe for Olifant, that is mentioned once in the whole world?

4 Likes

Dont get me with this one, SU-47 is still accepted as armed based on 1 random website, with no pictures to back it up whatsoever.

3 Likes

Yup, i still wonder how that passed lmfao

1 Like

Britain getting anything good …naaaaaaa

Gaijin please give us the ZA-HVM I’m tired of using the trash stormer lol

2 Likes

Not anymore:

Great work!

3 Likes

I must admit, leaklists brough my hopes up greatly
image
image

11 Likes

hope it’s G6-HVM

8 Likes

Ill be happy with both

7 Likes

Came back to this page given the recent leaks, seen your posted earlier about an attempt by someone to manipulate one of the sources you provided, glad to see you pointed that out, but how does that happen? like was it some random person here on the forums that did that or something else?

I’m just interested, since I’ve heard of it happening on here before, but never actually found a thread that its happend to, well… until now