They might not and I wouldn’t care either but how about the player base?
Awesome ,Gaijin can go for it.
Well ones a current invasion riddled with warcrimes with an entire country ruined, and one is political Brinkmanship.
But ok. Yeah keep pretending its somehow the same.
Things can be similar and not the same. Life isnt black and white
Also, Ukrainians dont consider themselves russians
While all chinese consider themselves China
1 Like
I never said it was identical, but that doesn’t mean they should be treated differently.
The difference is the Ukraine war is the current thing, so it’s the worst thing.
Well, I think ill have to respectfully disagree. They just need to do a favor by seperating things that might be seen as political, not conjoining them and then going “lalalala”
It just isnt realistic
But the 2 chinas consider themselves to both still be china and the legitimate government. Ukraine explicitly states it is NOT Russian while the current Russian leadership have effectively tried to say they are, which is kind of the whole reason of an invasion is going on…
Not the same thing at all. Very different approach should be taken.
2 Likes
US equipment in a communist tree is gross. Those vehciles are meant to fight the communists, not be used along side them. Simplifying it down to they are both Chinese misses the point. It’s like saying Russia and Ukraine are both former Soviet states.
4 Likes
A problem that becomes especially apparent in simulator battles.
3 Likes
Sorry for being a nerd but
I believe the 2nd picture is a Pantsir prototype, not Sosna-R
The Tubes, radar and turret overall look different than Sosna-R’s mountings so uh yeah sorry lol
Yes, I was corrected by _Fantom2451 earlier, still thanks though.
DW about it.
Russian Abrams,challengers,leopards, cv-90s , f-16s ?
Same would go for all the Russian equipment in Nato Stores
Here an American Su-27 dogfighting an F-16 over the dessert
But IMO not needed, giving every nation everything would just make the nation system obsolete.
They should split China into China and Pan-Asian tech trees (South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, maybe even Australia) respectively.
4 Likes
Thailand is probably going to Japan as a sub tt by the looks of it , aus vehicles are In america/British tt , s Korea and n Korea will be just like china and Taiwan (same tt) we can’t really have an ASEAN tt because firstly it’s not a country ,gaijin has never done that and they won’t go out of their way to do it for countries that have no indigenous designs like Thailand ,ph, Australia they designs they have are just refits and further developments of American/ Russian designs
2 Likes
They are?
I think its not a great Idea and not feasible if we were to split Tech Trees by political ideology and what ideological / geopolitical allegiance a Country, or a part of it, had during xy time period.
1 Like
All sub trees are selected based on politics or historical ties.
Thank you for the info. I personally think 8.7 would be way to high given the gepards 8.0 no?
Gep is 8.3
No LRF or therms
It’s more like the 8.3 Type 87 with LRF at 8.3 but a bit lower armour and mobility than the Gep
1 Like
Oh im off then, thats fair. Id really hope not 8.7 since its an abandoned place for USA
One could argue the gep actually belongs at 8.0 lol
In terms of SPAA capabilities, probably. It’s worse than the Shilka in that regard. But it absolutely shreds tanks.
1 Like