There’s a stock grind for tech tree aircraft. Your post’s reductionist argument is ruined.
None of those have AAMs when stock let alone all-aspect ones requires to deal with Mig-19s and Yak-28s.
No. But it is able to climb and get to speed very quickly.
There is always the issue of fighters bombing out the base before your bomb gets there though. You have watch your team and drop on a clear base.
Yep, though in that case, the same is true for much slower bombers like the Vautour and Buc S2. Which does potential play for the argument that the Yak-28B is fine at 9.3 when compared to eitehr
Yeah.
As already said, the issue is air rb no longer being viable for bombers.
yeah, that is the core issue for most of them.
does no one here, think that all these bombers are just in need of a down tier, and not a comparison. Should be comparing to the counters to the plane.
A decent amount of those has stock AAM actually.
also, most planes will intercept you as you get near the base where you are vulnerable, people be acting like putting this plane at 9.0 would be game breaking and make the game unplayable at 9.0, btw it wouldn’t. Yak28B is not a game changing aircraft and wouldn’t make the game any more unfair at 9.0.
You judge a plane by the dumbness of it’s players? Serious?
I played hundreds of battles in Ayit, Mig19, Ariete, CL13 before Yak28 looses his flares. Guess which plane was the last one standing every single battle, a Yak28 player with a single brain cell was in? And you want to put this plane in a spot where not a single plane would be able to counter it in a full downtier, doesn’t matter which skill players have.
Use your energy to make ARB better, not to put a useless plane in a better spot, where it’s also useless but untouchable. It only produces more egoistic players giving a s*** of game experience for all.
all i can say is skill issue, if you can’t counter it, its a skill issue
1 Like
It will not be a skill issue if it gets buffed down to 9.0
You will be going to see slow junk like Meteor, R2Y2 or Vampires instead, in downtier.
I am well aware that seeing a supersonic interceptor like J35XS sucks, but just sending it down to 9.0 will create other problems.
you act like a downtier means that you won’t see other 9.0s, also btw if i was an enemy and 1 Yak28 is alive flying high, I would take the opportunity to RP/SL grind by farming ground targets
theres a reason you see no one flying the Yak28B anymore
At least you will no longer see supersonic jets like F-104/Su-7 or Missile spammer like Ayit…
Maybe early SARH slingers like F3D or Vautour(interceptor) will be your biggest threat, and you can chaff them.
Yes. Yak-28B is one of the weakest 9.3BR jets and can do nothing but play passively.
Itself might be suited more in 9.0 than 9.3.
But thanks to the shitton level of compressions which creates problems and profit of Gaijin. Sadly it can’t move down to 9.0…
Look Up, I also spaded Yak-28B, and dislike the current status of her. :/
None of those should be 8.0 in the first place.
This thread just loops back to decompression being the main balance issue above 7.0.
2 Likes
Maybe Meteor F Mk. 8 can remain 8.0 if those shameless F-86A and MiG-15 get reverted to 8.3?
Agreed. That is a major reason for many problems, of course, it is also why Yak-28B and Vautour(Bomber) are suffering hard…
1 Like
Dude, your argumentation turns into a total joke.
I have no problem with silly, useless bombers. I know how to win my battles.
But it’s not about me in this discussion.
All people here trying to tell you, that it’s right, the Yak28 is in a bad spot, but moving it down makes it worse for all others.
Is there any chance that you think about it a single second?
That’s what I said in first place.
Every discussion about moving a specific plane down in BR makes no sense without a global decompression.
We see these discussions over and over in this forum but very rare a discussion about decompression. Meanwhile I think all these OPs have no interest in it. They are only interested to put THEIR plane in a better spot to grind faster.
I agree with this point overall.
But maaaaybe there might be an extremely narrow exception. :P
Tonka…
Which shares the exact same capability in ARB but has different BR between them.
(GBU-less on 11.3/GBU-ful on 11.7)
1 Like
Easy solution: Move the 11.3 version up and it’s done. lol