AJS37 what
That thing is 11.0 iirc
I don’t think it 8.0 would be cracked because it wasn’t even good at 8.3.
Ynow you could just like
Strip the all-aspects off some of them, AJS is fine bc thats already 11.0
It used to be 11.0. It got downtiered to 10.7 (which is reasonable as it’s simply an AJ37 with 2 more missiles (that can either be Aim-9Ls or Mavericks).
That fact that it is a supersonic plane with Aim-9Ls being able to face 9.7s without flares is pretty funny (although most 9.7s+ have flares).
But if it went back up to 11.0 again, it would be facing F-16s and MiG-29s / Yak-141s, so I’m not sure if that is reasonable.
1 Like
If the 163 can be 8.0 this should be too. Realistically both should be 8.3.
163s are fine at its BR if you mean 30mm ones.
B-0 and Ki-200 would be fine at 8.3BR imo but, they are not good as old days beacuse of bigger maps and Japanese 30mm cannons nerf.
The 8.0 one is untouchable by 7.0, 7.3 and even 7.7 with the exception of the La-200.
What?
F-5C never had flares
Almost every 8.0 is.
There are no ways for killing C-2b, Meteor Mk.8, La-15/174 for 7.0s and 7.3s and even 7.7s.
Oh boy… It sure did
Where’d you hear that?
From the Dutch, the Nords, and even Nigeria.
Where did you hear that it didn’t have flares?
Ah yes the export countries, not the USA
And…?
Are you saying Exports F-5s are different?
AMERICAN F-5Cs never had flares in AMERICAN service.
I couldn’t care less. The aircraft has the capability of using them.
Germany didn’t service R-27ERs, but lo and behold…
I don’t care either, I just made a joke. F-5C would be unplayable with zero flares, or be too good for a lower BR.
I sure love it when jokes are presented in a non-joking manner!
Buddy…