XM1 GM and Chrysler

image
image

Can i know why are these 2 at the BR they are currently at?
Expecially the GM version of the XM

From my experience with Xm1 players,the GM version has no place to be at 9.3,it overperforms,every single time i have a Xm1 GM in my team or the enemy team,its a guaranted nuke for them

There are 0 reason IMO why an Abrams should be at 9.3,in my opinion it should be at least 10.0

Of course its note to say that i do not own these vehicles but for what i seen in game and in the hangar their specifications,i find hard to believe that this tank should be 9.3
If some of you who are way more experienced than me would like to enlight me about why should stay at 9.3,please tell me

2 Likes

The GM I understand why it should be uptiered but for the Chrysler while yes it is faster it has worse armor and only 292mm of pen on its APFSDS.

3 Likes

Calling XM1 (GM) OP in year of our lord 2025? Moreso after the M735 nerf?

15 Likes

Ill speak about the XM1C , since thats the one i have.
Your only advantage is speed.
You dont penetrate a lot.
The armour is… Mediocre , but thats to be expected of a prototype.
Survivability is … Meh.
With the M-735 nerf , i am baffled that you think it “overperforms”

7 Likes

So these tanks are a problem but the 2S38 isn’t, you have some strange sense of balance mate

2 Likes

I never said that both of them are a problem,the only problem so far i had was the GM version which its literally an Abrams at 9.3
it has no downsides compared to any other mbt at the same br range
has the same weak spot as top tier MBTs but that doesnt mean it should be 9.3

Idk why youre talking about the 2S38 when it blows to be honest
And besides that,you still comparing a very functional MBT with a light vehicle,2 different class types that shouldnt be really compared

1 Like

Maybe if it had smoke grenades, a much better reload, and a better round yes. It’s a pretty good tank at 9.3, but it just doesn’t have the firepower or armour to go higher.

The Abrams is more armoued, more survivable, has more firepower, and is overall much better.

It still is an Abrams by definition tho,mind you its a proto

Talking about rounds…well maybe yeah but what it has,can still operate very well against uptiers so cant really tell much about it not gonna lie

Overall its a death machine compared to other MBTs at the same br bracket tho
It has legit everything you need in a tank for offensive and mobility wise
Dont have enough gun depression somehow?It has controlled suspensions,it has a fast reloading gun that packs a punch regardless,the armor it self its overall good compared to other MBTs + if you hull down in a Xm1 i doubt you can be touched not gonna lie

Sure maybe and i say MAYBE 10.0 its drastic but a slight move up in br wouldnt hur,maybe 9.7?

9.7 is only possible if it gets a shorter reload and M774, but I’d prefer it be 9.3 because it has a lineup there.

1 Like

It was always an analogue of the Leo 2K

But the Leo 2K ammo got better while the XM-1s got worse and worse, the only way these would go to 9.7 and higher is with M833 and smoke grenades.

1 Like

Oh this will be fun. Define Abrams then.

1 Like

Both are overpowered and deserve to be 9.7.

Is it? I personally dont have it so Im geniunely asking.

Cant speak too much on Chrysler, I dont recall ever seeing it in battle, for all I know it should follow the GM. And its been while since ive seen GM too.

As fo GM itself, it doesnt seem to be that good to warrant 9.7.

Survivability wise, the armor scheme offers around 185mm of effective armor on UFP and 268/273mm of KE protection on the turret cheeks. It also doesnt have smokes.

Firepower wise, reload time is rather standard, and the shell is nothing to write home about at 9.3. 10° and pneumatic suspension does seem nice tho.

Mobility wise, I guess that one is standout? The numbers on wiki say it should have almost 10HP/T more than Leopard 1A5 and both higher top speed and reverse, in game they feel similiar (not saying they are).

1 Like

They are both relatively too good for their 9.3 counterparts

This tank is not overperforming. Simply.

To be fair, both global KD and KpS for the last month, ie. stats that should be dragged down a lot by inexperienced players, are relatively high, 1.30 and 1.19 respectively for XM1 (GM).

All time KD and Kps are much more in line with what Id expect from vehicle with such kit.

Likely reason is that since XM1 (GM) was removed from sale, its only played by experienced players, driving up the stats.

xm1 hasnt been played by inexperienced players in a long time due to it being taken far out of the spotlight for USA premiums. It is good but not a top rank premium anymore and also doesn’t really get sold much.

If you simply compare the tank to other 9.3s, all it has is mobility. That’s it. It’s literally average or worse in almost any other regard.

2 Likes

Oh dont get me wrong, I agree with you on this. Im just trying to think of the reason why it has such high KD and KpS for the last month.

1 Like

they are never overperforming but always getting nukes when i see it
Either im jesus christ level and i meet only other jesus christs or saying “not overperforming” its wrong

IMO should be higher br regardless,as stated before,10.0 might be dramatic and im aware of that,9.7 would be good for GM version

The mentallity behind its

Give a good tank to someone bad and he would do bad 100% of the time
Give a good tank to someone whos DECENT at the game and he will do A LOT

Work with me here and literally just compare the vehicle to every other 9.3 please