The “wishlist” will be continuously updated with new information. If you have any useful details or requests for specific U.S. aircraft, tanks, or other equipment, feel free to comment or send a private message.
True, maybe it will be useful in strategic bombing in futures updates, maybe it could be used as finding bomb targets for bombers. + going mach. Jesus is awesome :D
The criteria for adding a vehicle is that at least one example had to have been built. It can also be an incomplete prototype if the systems required to be fully functional were just never installed (but still made).
The great majority of my vehicle preferences is WW2 stuff with very little cold war or later. Generally the newer something is, the less likely I am to be interested.
With that said, a couple vehicles from my personal wishlist.
Air:
F4U-5
This is the last fighter version of the entire F4U lineage (F4U-6 and F4U-7 were both more dedicated to ground attack), and so it features a few improvements over the F4U-4B.
In short, it has one of the best, if not the best supercharging system ever fitted onto a piston engine plane. They basically took what the Bf 109s had and turned it up to 11. If I remember right it also had improved control surfaces which would lead to less compression at high speeds.
Ground:
T25E1
This tank looks as if you took a T25 and made it look even more like the M26.
The main difference between the T25E1 and the T25 lays in the transmission. The T25E1 actually has the same transmission as the M26, just with lowered final drive gear ratios to allow for a higher top speed of 56 km/h. This makes the T25E1 substantially lighter than the T25 (35.2 vs 38.2 tons) due to the T25’s heavy electrical transmission.
It’s basically what the T25 is actually meant to be compared to the M26: an actual medium tank with improved mobility and less armor, rather than a pseudo heavy. The T25 in game is simply too heavy and the transmission too poorly modeled to realistically perform that task.
M45
It’s an M26, but it has a gyrostabilized 105 mm howitzer (same as the M4A3 (105)'s), and due to the much shorter barrel of the howitzer compared to the 90 mm gun, they had to increase the turret armor at the front substantially so that the turret wouldn’t be rear heavy. This means 127 mm thick armor at the turret front and a 203 mm thick mantlet.
And it has powered traverse unlike the M4A3 (105).
These are just some of the vehicles I can think of.