please read this as context to my thought process (controversy warning)
The difference is that Leo OTOMATIC was an Italian offer to the Bundeswehr. And again, what we’re saying is that we don’t want it in the tech tree (there are better German alternatives), but if it had to go somewhere it would probably end up in the German tech tree.
the Italo/anglo/german arty? yes of course
1 Like
No? (find me a proof please)
Dont we currently know pretty much nothing about that thing? Not even the performance of its missiles?
1 Like
the Italian community actually like the possibility of a second otomatic with different hull
1 Like
fair enough, i would make the phrogfoot go poof from the list but attention is attention… good or bad lol
thats completly fair as well as an event option or whatever, but you cant deny it for the german tree just for the hell of it, it has a possibility there
1 Like
And the sky is blue.
Your opinion, though I am not a ground player so I couldn’t care less. The Gripen remains a good addition to a nation who would’ve had to suffer with the Tornado and much like the Swedes, grind out the same plane with better radars and missiles.
Not far from being wrong, but Gaijin will give planes systems and ordinance they are capable of carrying, regardless if they actually did IRL. The American F-5C uses CMs that were never used in US service, but F-5Cs did mount them in the service of other nations.
My point entirely… there is no need to add jets that barely exist just to give each nation something each patch. There is no need for a nation to be relevant if there is nothing to give.
I can explain it to you, I cannot understand it for you. South Africa is a subtree of Britain. With this logic, you might as well delete all Australian, South African, Finnish, and other nations from the game.
I can show you a Flanker in Japanese livery, doesn’t mean it makes sense or that it’s going to happen.
ups lost myself in the argument gotta walk doggos
Looks like the Ystervarks final form
1 Like
AFAIK it was supposed to use the rolands or the VT-1s when they came around
not a single proof in that suggestion mention this “proposal”
Then why not go and make a suggestion about it for the Italian TT instead of crying here
we are not crying lol, we just want you to stop claiming a machine that doesn’t belong to your tree
I tried twice to did it. Both not accepted.
thats literaly the yak141 they gave that to USSR out of the heck of it when they got the mig29 1 patch earlier
air sub tree doesnt exist
isnt a sub tree, their stuff can be found in different nations same with canada, additions of 1 nations dont necesarily forbid them for others, heck france has a finish ITO 90M
if it was offered to japan why not
Seems kinda redundant, don’t you think?
thats one of italies guys that wrote it for the italian tree as a suggestion, look trough the soruces if you wanna