This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
He is just ragebaiting, not worth arguing
I know him for months, why would he troll like this, it’s pretty sad.
Considering its 10.7. I wasnt counting that among those at top tier if you want to pedantic then yes. But its still tailing just behind the DM53. And you are kinda proving my point here given the 292 also has a really long reload rate to compensate for high pen and just proving my point that the Abrams should get a long reload rate.
Rarely. Usually Abrams survive hits to places that OHK everything else.
Though US players also have to be dumb to not OHK litereally everything else in game with their great shell.
Hopefully they rework DU shells to model their advantages
The abrams has less frontal area where it can be penned by top tier rounds, the main difference is that the UFP on the abrams will deflect on most of its area, the Challanger hull in a whole weakspot.
The turret is similar for both, the abrams has more turret ring weakspot, the chally has more manlet weakspot.
2 Likes
I never aim for the turret ring because L27A1 always non-pens/ricochets, so I dont know why that is suppose to be this super weakspot.
Challengers are missing most of their spall liners as well and due to crew position, and such, they provide no meaningful survivability, Any pen is 99.99% chance of a OHK.
Again… You are claiming the Turret ring is this super massive weakspot and yet ignoring the fact that if you hit a Challenger 2, Ariete, etc anywhere other than a few strong spots, it will probably OHK.
So you are claiming the Abrams has worse survivability than most because it has a weakspot and yet ignoring the fact that most tanks dont have weakspots, instead they have strongspots and if you hit anywhere other than the strongspots you will OHK
By my god, these american trolls. If they had it their way the F-15E would be 12.0 and the M1A2 would be 10.3. Though they probably still do badly
2 Likes
Typical american main when proved wrong
Claims “rage baiting” rather than accepting the truth
I’m not gonna accept a lie tho, Abrams doesn’t even come close to being the second best tank
How about we just do away with nations and everyone gets every vehicle
Then what is?
Best to worst:
Leopard 2/122
Abrams
T-80/T-90
TKX/Leclerc
ZTZ/Merkava
Challenger 2/Ariete
No other tank has the combination of survivability, firepower and mobility that the Abrams has bar the Leopard 2s. Which is why they are above the Abrams
T-80’s have much more pros over the abrams than cons xd
Better armor
Better mobility
Spall liners
Magic side ERA
Only cons it has are slightly worse shell and longer reload
Bar the stupidly OP ERA. I find the T-80s easier targets to kill than the Abrams. Especially as they tend to have to expose themselves far more than the Abrams does.
Also, they are getting a turret basket next major. So according to American logic, that means they will have terrible survivability
At this point i’m sure he’s trolling, he literally put Challengers next to Ariete while it’s obviously better at everything other than the the round.
1 Like
T-80s with spall liners, interesting…
Your mobility claim is also incorrect.
Oopsie, my bad I forgot that it’s the T90M that has them
They are faster tho?
I think he meant forward speed and they get better transmission compared to T72s,T90s.
Holy American trolling.
CR2 has the worst mobility of any tank at top tier.
Weakest shell at top tier bar DM43 on a single Leopard 2. Though L27A1 spall is bugged as hell, and rarely does anything.
Worst sustained fire rate
Extremely poor survivability. Only really beaten by the Ariete.
So. It has the worst mobility, firepower and second worst survivability of any other tank at top tier, in game right now. Most tanks have at least one notable trait such as a great glass canon, or great flanker/pusher. Even if they dont have good survivability. CR2 doesnt have any
So Im just gunna call typical low skill american mains claiming for massive buffs for highly competitive vehicles again and call it there. Have a good day American trolls
2 Likes
Considering their reverse, they aren’t.