I’ve just had a random thought, if and when they add the SEPv3 it will obviously go to America. But if they add the Australian SEPv3 will it go to Britain or will it go to America as a second tech tree SEPv3? I surly hope it’s not a squadron or a premium. But I would like it to be a second tech tree version for the US line up. What do you guy’s think?
6 Likes
Lets hope no, if canada gets a leopard in germany just cause its german the same logic should apply.
5 Likes
Germany gets a Hunter cause it’s British
13 Likes
That indeed is random.
anyway IIRC canada and australia are not going to get subtrees but go to whenever gaijin deems they are neccesary.
its because of that we got canadian leos in germany and US gets the ausie abrams.
i dont think UK will get the new ausie abrams and will follow the first one to the US TT.
4 Likes
Canada is not official subtree, thus the vehicle goes to manufacturer. See the F-14 IRIAF.
Im aware, my only concern is the united states is just barely unique with the abrams. If england gets an abrams the U.S is a useless grind.
you might argue that US top tier might become useless to grind if UK gets the new ausie abrams, but even then US has access to other vehicles, and most importantly, lineups UK doesnt.
2 Likes
Looks Hunter F58 before Swizterland was a Sub-TT for Germany or HMS Royal Soverign in the soviet TT
6 Likes
well month after gainjin said theyre not putting R-73 onto MiG-29 they added MiG-29 with R-73s.
You know how it goes.
1 Like
Yes but in comparison, f15s, f16s, f18s, 1 harrier, every sherman, 2 m36s, idek how many m18s, 2 bulldogs, 3 m109s, who knows how many m113 variants, all of the ah64s, little birds, and black hawks, and cobras. The list just started, some of the U.S most iconic vehicles are everywhere in the game and some are “better” with MAWS and such. Explain why gaijin refuses to give things like MAWS and upgrade packages the U.S created. Just because lend lease exist doesn’t mean they should disregard the U.S TT.
M24DK, LEO1A5NO, F-5A(G)-40
Denmark and Sweden aren’t confirmed subtrees of sweden yet that logic doesn’t apply to these vehicles
thats just being export oriented nation.
not like this issue is unique to the US. Up until 2A7V germany was the worst nation to pick if you wanted to play Leo2s - kinda funny since they created these damn things.
I think this was mentioned quite few times on this forum already - by the time other nations had to upgrade their vehicles, US already moved onto the next best thing.
consider that italy retired F-104S.ASA year before US accepted Raptor into the service.
1 Like
Then theres still an argument to be made that at least they are geographically and culturally linked so at least it makes some sense.
unlike, lets say, that proposal of adding india to israel as subtree.
1 Like
If you solely main a export central nation, then expect to see modified variants of your vehicles crop up.
Don’t just main 1 nation
(I do understand unneeded copy paste is unwanted though, I agree with that)
In referring to BOL pods and MAWS
- U.S F16
U.S f18
And no, im not saying its unique to the U.S but its more apparent. I will admit germany having a worse 2a7 is stupid but thats out side this topic.
3 Likes
Britain will probably end up getting most of its commonwealth stuff at some point.
So?
Australian Abrams to the UK
Egyption Abrams to Israel
Polish Abrams to Germany
Ukrainian Abrams to Soviets
Moroccan Abrams to Italy
Taiwanese Abrams to China
South Korean Abrams to Japan
:P
3 Likes
No, they do not need an Abrams at all, and they do not want an Abrams since it suffers from various issues more than the Challenger itself.
2 Likes
Only if that was even remotely true.
3 Likes
I dont thanks, i have several top tiers so thanks. But “better” dude do your home work if you look up “American made MAWS for there aircraft” you find a plethora of MAWS the united states made. Theses foreign “upgrades” you speak of, were licensed by the U.S for our allies so if they get it we get it.